100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Evaluation of self defence - Criminal law $5.21   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Evaluation of self defence - Criminal law

 18 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of evaluation of self defence for OCR, written by an A* student

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • June 7, 2023
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Self defence evaluation:
Pre-emptive strikes are allowed: D can defend himself even if an attack has
not yet begun (AG’s Ref No.2.) - evaluation: Could be open to abuse by
vigilantes. However, it is fair in situations where D has no alternative -
shouldn’t have to wait to be attacked. BUT battered women can’t use defence
of SD if preemptively attack their abuser – will need to use partial defences
under Coroners & Justice Act.
s.76CJIA (codified Williams) – D is judged on the facts as he believed them to
be, even if that belief was mistaken. Psychiatric evidence that D suffers from a
condition, making him more likely to perceive danger, cannot be taken into
account (Martin). If D is mistaken because he is voluntarily intoxicated, then
he cannot use defences (O’Grady) - evaluation: This seems fair, as an
objective test would be harsh. It seems unfair that the condition can’t be
considered when s.76 CJIA clearly states that self-defence is based on ‘facts as
D genuinely believed them to be’. CJIA doesn’t define self-defence & this has
led to problems deciding when it can be used & whether police should be
treated differently, (Bennet). Seems fair, as D has been reckless.
The force used must be reasonable. Criminal Justice and Immigration Act
(CJIA) says that when deciding if force is reasonable it will be taken into
account that D may not, at the time of the event, be able to ‘weigh to a nicety’
what is reasonable. As long as D acts ‘honestly and instinctively’ it will
suggest that reasonable action was taken. s.43 Crime & Courts Act 2013 -
householders can now lawfully use anything LESS than ‘grossly
disproportionate’ force to protect their own property. - evaluation: This
principle seems fair, however it will be difficult for juries to decide if the force
used was reasonable or excessive. Law is often too generous to D (Sharman).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller scarlettbuckle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.21  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart