Summary
History of Economic Thought chapter 3 summary
- Course
- Institution
- Book
A summary of the third chapter (3rd) of the subject History of economic thought at the University of the book Economic Methodology.
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 7 summary
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 6 summary
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 5 summary
1 review
By: gillesamerika • 6 year ago
By: Jort1995 • 6 year ago
Hi Gilles are you on the UB Saturday or Sunday? Then you can still get that book from me. Mvg, Jort
Seller
Follow
Jort1995
Reviews received
Content preview
Week 2 chapter 3 “Popper’s Critical Rationalism”Popper’s demarcation of science from non-science rested on the notion of falsifiability. Science
distinguishes itself from pseudo-science by being able to be falsified. In this way the theory was risky
and allowed for critique. It was a way of admitting that human knowledge was not yet able to
encompass real scientific knowledge. Pseudo-science on the other hand was immune to critique by
writing theories so general as possible. This is called the immunizing stratagem. For popper pseudo-
science was not necessarily useless, it would still have meaning and could be falsified in a later point
in time. Popper’s view thus clashed with the traditional logical positivists view.
Popper accepted the induction problem and had the opinion that real science never really used the
induction method. The induction method was prone to logical asymmetry no universal statement
can be verified by a collection of singular statements but one singular statement can contradict a
universal statement. Instead he used the falsifiability notion, on the grounds that real science should
not be easy and there always exisists some evidence that can falsify the claim. He held that a
scientific rule is conclusively falisifiable but not conclusively verifiable. As one exception refutes the
claim and one can never no if all possible observations are made. His theory of demarcation can be
stated as: observations from a sample can be divided into two categories the class of all those basic
statements with which it is inconsistent (the potential falsifiers of the theory) and secondly the class
of statements which it does not contradict. Both must be non-empty to make sure the theory is really
scientific. Because every scientific theory excludes some observations it cannot possibly be verified.
Therefor a theory can be rigorously tested, and held as the best theory at that moment, until is
bettered by another theory.
For Popper, the growth of knowledge depends on problems and our attempts to solve them. Solving
theories consists of formulating theories in which problems can be solved. This was, according to
popper dependent on the capability of creative imagination. Along these lines, he advocated
deductive testing where conclusions are inferred through hypothesis conjured by imagination. These
conclusions are then compared and tested if they corroborate or falsify the hypothesis. This boils
down to whether one theory has better predictive power than the other, due to its better empirical
content. Popper holds the logical empiricists view that one can deduce meaning from experience but
does not place too much meaning on experience. He rather uses experiences as a method to show
which theories are false rather than which are true. A theory can be said to corroborate by past
experience with a statement if it withstands the best other comparable predictions from other
theories. i.e. it holds the best predictive power.
For Popper critical spirit is the essence of science.
Popper rejected the approach to science of picking the most probable explanation. He placed more
value on the predictability, which is dependent on the empirical content which is higher the more
improbable it is as it has more potential falsifiers. This does increase the testability of a theory.
Unsurprisingly Popper was uneasy with the notion of truth, every theory must remain an open ended
hypothesis and potentially be false.
Popper and Friedman agree on these grounds, that predictability is the most important justifier of
theories above probability.
Propper opposed historicism the view that history develops according to certain principles. Primarily
using historic events to making predictions towards a deterministic end. He argued that what
happens is largely the unplanned and unforeseeable result of the actions of many individuals. As
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jort1995. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now