Summary
History of Economic Thought chapter 5 summary
- Course
- Institution
- Book
A summary of the fifth chapter (5th) of the subject History of economic thought at the University of the book Economic Methodology.
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 7 summary
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 6 summary
-
History of Economic Thought chapter 4 summary
1 review
By: gillesamerika • 6 year ago
Seller
Follow
Jort1995
Reviews received
Content preview
Week 7 Chapter 5 “The sociology of Scientific knowledge”Traditional philosophy of science used idea’s from logical positivism (i.e. logic, inference and á priori
assumptions) to explain science. This is a “prescriptive” method of judgement of rationality, with no
further method for discovery or so (Reichenbach chapter1).
The Sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) refers to the manner in which sociology as a modern
social science has been used to explain science. This holds that knowledge is bound to certain
theories in the subject, accepted by scientist accordingly to their interests. This means that the
acceptance of a scientific theory is more so caused by its compatibility with social interests than its
success of explanation. Furthermore there is no “right” reasoning as this is dependent on a scientists
beliefs and these differ per scientist. SSK reflects Kuhn’s (chapter 4) influence on scientific paradigms:
Scientists work in framework that sub-continuously make them make assumptions, so that
they are not fully aware that they are holding certain beliefs pre-emptively.
Scientists tend to hold on to these assumptions if these where the pre dominant influence in
the social structure in which they learned.
There are two main SSK approaches:
The Edinburgh School Strong Programme makes the assertion that all scientific knowledge is socially
constructed. This follows the naturalistic approach to scientific knowledge, this follows four main
principles:
Causality, focus on the causal conditions of scientists beliefs.
Impartiality, between true and false beliefs (unbiased) – no one true knowledge base.
Symmetry, one causality explains both true and false beliefs.
Reflexivity, explanations direct back to SSK, SSK is subject to the same principles
The laboratory approach (micro sociological) which emphasizes the daily practices of scientists in
their laboratories influence on knowledge. This is also called the naïve approach as it does not take
bias to certain procedures in laboratory practices into account. This approach thus emphasizes that
research is not only bound by technology levels, but also by surroundings.
Social constructivism is the idea that scientists create knowledge in the course of their work through
social structure and mechanism, rather than discovering it in an experimental process. Idea’s in this
framework: Relativism: truth is subjective to changing worldly contexts (Edinburgh strong view).
Often called the interest thesis. Knowledge is a constant tug of war between social conflicts.
Relativism is in stark contrast to logical positivism (i.e. Popper and Lakatos). Criticism to relativism is
that it is a self-defeating view. It sees itself as the true view, meaning that it must be objectively true,
which contradicts its own notions. Thus violating the reflexivity principle mentioning earlier. Realism
is the view that things are the way that they are, science is a journey in which increasing amounts of
discoveries are done – creating an increasingly realistic picture of the world. Core is that this is al
independent of human views. SSK places doubt on this realism by addressing the method in which
scientific discovery is carried out. Indeed SSK brings in doubt the very reason that scientists are held
in high regard, their capacity to overcome social and historical contexts in pursuit of real truths. What
SSK does, just as with other views, incorporates this view in the competing framework of views, in a
value-neutral setting as possible. SSK has a purely descriptive nature.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jort1995. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now