PHI 115 Exam 1- InQuizitive Practice & Quizzes (100% verified)

Is it possible to evaluate a moral theory rationally? correct answers yes How do you evaluate a moral theory rationally? correct answers by using plausible criteria of adequacy Framing someone for a crime they didn't commit is an example of punishing the innocent. Why is one justified in believing that such and act is wrong? correct answers because it is self-evident In order to even be eligible for evaluation, a moral theory must first meet a minimum standard. What makes up that minimum standard? correct answers it must be coherent What is demonstrated by comparing "applying the criteria of adequacy" and "a doctor diagnosing an illness"? correct answers there is no set formula for how to apply the criteria of adequacy, that doesn't mean applying those criteria is subjective When philosophers reflect on morality, they try to achieve reflective equilibrium. How would they know they have achieved it? correct answers when there is as much agreement and coherence as possible between considered moral judgements and moral theory One criterion for evaluating scientific theories is conservatism: how well a theory fits with what scientist already know. This is similar to the criterion of adequacy called: correct answers consistency with considered moral judgements TRUE or FALSE One's considered moral judgements can be mistaken. correct answers true TRUE or FALSE Ethical egoism says that the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself. correct answers true Which actions does divine command theory say are morally right? correct answers actions that God commands TRUE or FALSE A moral theory that is internally inconsistent is not eligible for further evaluation correct answers true TRUE or FALSE Moral agents can be mistaken about their moral experience correct answers true TRUE or FALSE