Background
To test the validity of diagnosis
People diagnose patients using tools
Psychiatrists criticise the medical model
Aims
- To see if people would be classed as insane
- To see if insane people would be classed as sane
Method
- Observation
- Pseudo patients of diff occupations. Rosenhan was one of them (not sample, they
were confederates).
Sample
- Patients + staff at 12 hospitals located in 5 states - 1960s
- The sample wasn’t the pseudo patients
Procedure
Each rang hospital for app + told them they were hearing voices saying empty hollow bcs
they showed existential crisis but not linked to schizo.
False name + job to protect future
Study 1
Procedure
- Followed normal routine apart from not taking medication’
- Observed + took notes on p much everything. Done secretly until they realised no
one cared
Data collection
Observation
- Diary entries
- A request - approach staff and ask smth like ‘when am I likely to be discharged?’
Result
- All let go w diagnosis of schizo in remission
- Stayed for average of 19 days
, - Effect of labelling. Normal behaviours interpreted as symptoms like obsessive
writing disorder + queuing for lunch
- Patients lack privacy. Toilets didn’t have doors. Depersonalisation
Explanations
Failure can’t be due to
- Quality of hospitals
- Observation time
- Behaviour
Study 2
Ps are staff at hospital. Told results of study
Procedure
Told that they were gonna send fake patients to the hospital. Each of them asked to rate all
patients on a scale from 1-10. 1 being they thought they were pseudopatients. None were
sent though
IV - false info
DV - no. of patients suspected
Results
Over 3 months, 193 admitted
- 41 suspected by at least 1 staff
- 23 suspected by at least 1 psychiatrist
- 19 suspected by both
Conclusions
False positive diagnosis - saying something does exist when it doesn’t. Like saying
someone is sick when they’re not
False negative diagnosis - saying something doesn’t exist when it does. Saying someone is
healthy when they’re sick
Mini exp 0
4 hospitals to see if staff behaved diff towards patients in hospital compared to people in
Stanford uni
Procedure
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aleshbaahmed. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.40. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.