100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Psychology AQA, A-Level Attachment $7.56   Add to cart

Class notes

Psychology AQA, A-Level Attachment

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Everything you need to know about attachment in A-Level psychology. 27 pages long, evaluations included. Page 1: caregiver-infant interactions Page 2: reciprocity and interactional synchrony Pages 3+4: Stages of Attachment Pages 5+6: Role of The Father Pages 7-10: Animal Studies Pages 11+1...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 27  pages

  • June 21, 2023
  • 27
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Me
  • All on attachment
avatar-seller
Psychology, Attachment, AQA A-Level


Psychology, AQA, A Level




Attachment




Caregiver-Infant Interactions in Humans


When we refer to infancy, this is generally understood to mean the first year of a child’s life and the

period before they begin to learn to speak.


One of the main key interactions between caregivers and infants is their non-verbal communication,

for example, how they communicate without words or sounds.


It is believed that it is these interactions that form the basis of how attachment occurs between the

caregiver and infant. The manner in which each responds to one another through how sensitive they

are to one another’s signals determines the formation of attachment and how deep the relationship

is.

, Psychology, Attachment, AQA A-Level


Reciprocity and Interactional Synchrony


Reciprocity occurs between infants and carers resulting in mutual behaviour where both parties are able to generate a
response from one another almost like a conversation e.g smiling by the parent results in smiling by the baby. Such
interactions between the infant and carer facilitate and strengthen the attachment bond.

Brazelton (1979) suggested reciprocal behaviour was an important precursor for the development of communication later.
Signals the infant gives allows the carer to anticipate the child’s responses and respond appropriately. It is this sensitivity to
the child’s needs and behaviour which lays the foundation for attachment to develop.

Tronick et al. (1979) found that when mothers who had been engaged in dialogue with their babies were asked to stop
moving and remain static, the babies would become puzzled and distressed when their smiles were unable to provoke a
reciprocal response. This highlights how babies engage and anticipate reciprocal responses to their own behaviour.

Interactional synchrony involves infants imitating specific hand and facial gestures from an adult model and broadly refers
to a finely tuned coordination of behaviours between the child and parent during speaking and listening. Infants and parents
are seen to develop a shared sense of timing and rhythm which develops into a flow of mutual behaviours. Meltzoff &
Moore (1983) demonstrated that interactional synchrony occurred with infants imitating facial expressions, tongue
protrusions and mouth openings from an adult model when only three days old. This suggests the behaviour was innate
rather than learned.



EVALUATION

• OneCaregiver-Infant
major issue intoInteractions in Humans
observing caregiver-infant interactions is testing infant behaviour is incredibly difficult as their
facial expressions are almost continuously changing. Behaviours observed in the Meltzoff & Moore study may lack
When
validity as we refer to infancy,
expressions involvingthis is generally
sticking their tongue out, yawning, smiling, opening their mouths and movements
understood to mean the first year
of hands occur constantly in young babies. of a child’s life it incredibly difficult to distinguish between general
This makes
and theand
behaviour period before
actual they begin
interactional to learn to
synchrony. speak. such theories may lack internal validity due to not
Therefore
necessarily measuring interactional synchrony.
One of the main key interactions between
• caregivers
Meltzoff and infants
& Moore’s study isalso
their non-verbal
lacks reliability as successive attempts to replicate the findings have failed. For
communication, for example,
example, Koepke et al (1983) was unable how theyto recreate the same findings although one weakness claimed by Meltzoff
andcommunicate without
Moore was their studywords
lackedorcontrol
sounds. and thus had validity.

It is believed that it is these interactions that form
• Onethe basis of
practical how attachment
application for suchoccurs between
findings the can be placed in the same rooms with their children instantly
is mothers
caregiver
so they and infant.
can begin to formThe manner inbonds
attachment whichunlike
each previous practice where they were kept separate.
responds to one another through how sensitive
• theyet
Deyong arealto one another’s
(1991) observed signals
infantsdetermines the
when they interacted with two objects. One simulated tongue movements
formation
while the otherofsimulated
attachmenttheand how deep
opening the of the mouth. They found infants within the median age of 5 to
and closing
relationship
12 weeks is. interactional synchrony or response to the objects. This suggests infants do display specific
made little
social responses to human interactions as reciprocity and interactional synchrony suggests as they do not simply
imitate everything.


• Interactional synchrony does not have cross-cultural support which weakens the idea that it is innate and necessary
for attachment as it is not universal. Le Vine et al (1994) found that Kenyan mothers had little interactions with their
infants yet a high proportion of them were still classed as securely attached.

• Condon & Sander (1974) analysed infant video recordings to find they did co-ordinate their behaviour in sequence
with the adults speech almost as if were a conversation involving taking turns. This supports the idea of interactional
synchrony having validity as Isabella et al (1989) also found that infants with secure attachments also demonstrated
such behaviour in their first year.

, Psychology, Attachment, AQA A-Level




Schaffer and Emerson’s Stages of Attachment

Rudolf Schaffer and Peggy Emerson conducted a landmark study into attachment in the 1960s
which they used to help them construct a description of how attachment develops in humans.

Stage 1: Indiscriminate attachments: From birth until approximately the 2-month stage, infants
produce similar responses to all objects regardless of whether they are inanimate objects or not.
Towards the end of this stage, they may begin to show a preference for social stimuli, such as a
smiling face. t is during this stage that reciprocity and interactional synchrony play a role in
establishing the infant’s relationships

.Stage 2: Attachment begins: The second stage occurs between 2 months to 6 months with babies
becoming more sociable and able to distinguish people with a preference for their company over
inanimate objects. They do not display stranger anxiety allowing themselves to be comforted by
anyone.

Stage 3: discriminate attachment: The third stage takes place from 7 months with babies beginning
to display separation anxiety from their main attachment figure through protesting when separated.
They also begin to show stranger anxiety and a sense of relief and joy when reunited with their
primary caregiver showing a specific attachment towards them. The attachment bond is not always
with the person who spends the most time with them but rather with the person who is most
sensitive to the child’s needs with the quality.

Stage 4: Multiple attachments: Stage four occurs from around 10 months onwards with the infant
displaying multiple attachments after the first attachment has formed with their primary caregiver.
Schaffer and Emerson found that 29% of infants had formed secondary attachments within one
month of forming their first attachment. At six months the infant will show multiple attachment
behaviours to many people within their social circles such as siblings, the other parent,
grandparents. They may have five or more secondary attachment figures at this point. Schaffer &
Emerson found 78% of infants at six months had multiple attachments and almost all displayed
multiple attachments at the age of one year

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller wnoates. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.56. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75619 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.56
  • (0)
  Add to cart