100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ESSAY: How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises ? $5.25   Add to cart

Essay

ESSAY: How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises ?

 25 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Foreign policy essay covering Korea, Suez and the Falklands War. Featuring A/A* band evaluation, facts and discussion of how each of these crises affected the British publics view of the nations position in the world as well as their 'special relationship' with America. DO NOT PLAGIARISE!!! To be ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • June 22, 2023
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
avatar-seller
How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises 1951-97
The UK was involved in three major international crises in this period: the Korean War, the
Suez Crisis and the Falklands War. Although other crises occurred, such as the Vietnam War,
Britain steered clear of these which in the case of Vietnam, ultimately prevented them from
failure and therefore was a successful decision. On a wider scale, British handling of
international crises was generally successful, despite the Suez crisis of 1956 being a complete
failure.

Britain’s response to the Korean War was generally a success. UK forces joined the UN
forces following North Korea’s invasion of the South in June 1950 in order to challenge
communist aggression. Although this was a contributing factor to 10% of British GDP being
spent on military and defence, a percentage that Britain could not truly afford in years of
post-war austerity, the war was the first major challenge to the credibility of the UN of which
Britain was a founding member and arguably allowed Britain to maintain the façade of being
a great power despite being severely economically weakened by WW2. In addition,
involvement in the war was a success as it showed a commitment to the so-called “special
relationship” with America, even if US troops dwarfed Britain’s and the important decision to
push North in September 1950 was largely influenced by American military leadership. This
commitment to American interests on the part of Britain ensured US commitment in return to
the defence of Britain and support for NATO, which was crucial for the protection of British
interests. This meant that involvement in the Korean War was ultimately a success, as it
ensured British safety, defended South Korea, and reinforced American ties to Europe, the
latter of which allowed Britain to decrease military spending in later years.

In contrast, the Suez Crisis of 1956 was undoubtedly a failure. The Suez Canal was a vital sea
route for oil, and since 1875 Britain had been a majority shareholder in running it. In mid-
July 1956, following US and British withdrawal of a loan due to an unwillingness to adopt
pro-Western policies, Nasser took control of the Anglo-French company that ran the canal.
Prime Minister Anthony Eden responded to this by attacking Egypt in late October 1956 with
France. The invasion itself was a failure, and the dire consequences of Eden’s decision were
enforced by Eisenhower’s anger and a potential end to the “special relationship”, as America
had wanted the crisis to be resolved peacefully. Eden’s decision was especially harmful given
the wider context of the USSR’s invasion of Hungary to crush efforts of anti-communist
reform there, making it difficult for the USA to condemn the USSR, especially as Nasser’s
actions were not illegal and the USSR was able to condemn it as imperialist. Suez further
signalled the end of Britain’s legacy as a great imperialist power, giving the public a “wake
up call” that the country no longer wielded the influence on a global stage that it had before
the war. This made the invasion, to a great extent, a failure.

Arguably even more successful than British involvement in the Korean War was the 1982
Falklands Crisis. Although it did not necessarily elevate Britain on the international stage, it
was hugely supported in Britain and transformed Margaret Thatcher’s personal political
fortunes leading to her landslide 1983 election victory. The response to Argentina’s invasion

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller georginaparbrook. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57114 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.25
  • (0)
  Add to cart