100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MBE Practice Questions Set 5 questions and correct answers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
12
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-07-2023
Written in
2022/2023

A company operated a small amusement park on property it owned near a residential neighborhood. On a day when the park was closed, a 10-year-old girl snuck into the park with some friends by climbing over a chain link fence. While climbing on one of the carnival rides, the girl slipped and cut her leg on an exposed gear assembly, sustaining serious injuries. Through her guardian ad litem, the girl brought suit against the company to recover damages for her injuries. At trial, she presented evidence of the accident and her injuries. In defense, the company established that the girl read and understood the "No Trespassing" signs that were attached to the fence. The company also established that it had not had any previous reports of children sneaking into the park when it was closed. Before submission of the case to the jury, the company moved for summary judgment. Is the court likely to grant the company's motion? A. Yes, because the girl was a trespasser who the company had no reason to anticipate would be on the property. B. Yes, because the girl knew she was trespassing and was old enough to recognize the danger. C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park. D. No, because the appeal of the carnival rides attracted the girl into the park. - correct answers Answer: C The court is not likely to grant the company's motion because the jury must determine whether the attractive nuisance doctrine applies. Under this doctrine, a landowner has a duty to exercise ordinary care to avoid reasonably foreseeable risk of harm to children, including trespassing children, caused by artificial conditions on his property. Here, while the company has presented some evidence against application of the attractive nuisance doctrine, it is ultimately the trier of fact's role to determine whether the doctrine applies and whether the company exercised ordinary care. Hence, the court will likely deny the company's motion and allow the jury to make that determination.

Show more Read less
Institution
MBE
Course
MBE









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
MBE
Course
MBE

Document information

Uploaded on
July 2, 2023
Number of pages
12
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
brittton phoenix
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
153
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
95
Documents
5174
Last sold
2 weeks ago
BRITTTON PRESENTS YOU WITH QUALITY EXAM,TESTBANKS AND ASSIGNMENTS

providing high quality grades is my all time priority, welcome to the world of super grades All The Best!!!!

3.4

20 reviews

5
7
4
3
3
5
2
1
1
4

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions