100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden
logo-home
COMPLETE Summary week 6 - Cultural Industries (6013B0544Y) $8.43
In den Einkaufswagen

Zusammenfassung

COMPLETE Summary week 6 - Cultural Industries (6013B0544Y)

 0 mal verkauft
  • Kurs
  • Hochschule

Do you have no more than a week to have an exam? Then this is the right document for you. The document has all abstracts, summaries, and vocabularies/terminologies highlighted for each article for the cultural industries module of the University of Amsterdam, Business Administration Minor. It h...

[ Mehr anzeigen ]

vorschau 3 aus 19   Seiten

  • 3. juli 2023
  • 19
  • 2021/2022
  • Zusammenfassung
avatar-seller
Lecture introduction: Market characteristics of quality signals
● Unpredictability of subjective experiences
○ Especially for products with hard to observe or discern quality
○ You do not know the quality until you experience
■ Experience good.
1. Movies
2. High art
3. Museum
● Objective quality measures for evaluation are largely lacking
○ Standard from objective point of view is lacking
■ What is 'beautiful'?
■ People have different opinions. That subjectivity is the main topic of
today.
○ Who decides?
■ Standards? Agenda?
○ How iis it announced?
● Consumers may respect quality in CCI but attach different meaning to the term
○ People think differently with different backgrounds
● Agreement on quality (high or low) means that there are major differences of opinions
● Self-reinforcing feedback loops
○ Heard behavior are helpful explaining inequality in the 'distribution' of success



Why Some Awards Are More Effective Signals of Quality Than Others:
A Study of Movie Awards

Main points

(lecture)
Compare effectiveness of different awards (signals of quality) on consumer purchase behavior
by considering the extent to which selection system typology impacts the competitive process

How do the effectiveness of each award differ across the mainstream and independent U.S
motion picture industries?

This article developed and empirically tested a conceptual framework that predicts which types
of awards are the most effective as signals of quality in different contexts

Overall, our results suggest that consumers give different degrees of credibility to different types
of awards, and that the composition of the award jury influences the effectiveness of the
awards.

,This article argues that, depending on the type of product involved, end consumers rely on
different types of information sources, that is, consumer-, expert-, or peer- based information


Key terminologies
Juries
can be primarily composed of end consumers, experts, or peers
Selection system theory
describes three ideal types of product selection: market, expert, and peer selection
Market or consumer selection
consumers select among the products available based on their own judgments
Experts selection
consumers may select among the products available after consideration of the opinions of
experts
Peers selection
consumers can be guided by the evaluations of competing producers (peers) when selecting
among the available products

Attribution theory
in their decision-making process, consumers do not simply accept signals of quality with blind
faith but attempt to assess for themselves whether the source of the cue is credible or not

● Source credibility
○ Trustworthiness and expertise
○ Consumers weight on information provided by a signal from a highly credible
source

Source-Credible awards
Assumed to be high in the case in which an award jury is composed of types of persons (i.e.,
consumers, experts, or peers) similar in kind, according to selection system typology, to the
sources on which the audience normally relies when making a buying decision

Salience
prominence or “level of activation” of a brand in a consumer’s memory

Salient awards
assumed to be high up in a consumer’s consideration set and thus in the end are likely to have
more effect on purchase decisions than other types of awards

Herd behavior
consumer’s decision- making process is highly influenced by the opinions and actions of others
—and consequently creates inequality and unpredictability of market shares.

Awards

, may provide the award winners with money and fame or other benefits, such as statuettes or
specific privileges. More important, though, an award may function as a signal of quality that
helps consumers and other actors in the value system in their product selection process.

experience product
consumers will have to view a movie themselves to be sure whether they like it, and they will not
get a refund if the movie does not meet their expectations
● Strong social interaction among consumers generates "herd behavior"
○ Decision-making process are highly influenced by the opinions and actions of
the others
■ Creating inequality and unpredictability of market shares
● Criteria consumers use to evaluate the quality of a film are not utilitarian (hedonic)
○ Strong impetus for potential consumers to look for credible and salient signals.
● Previous research on film and quality signals point to
○ Review - arthouse film - expert based
○ WOM- mainstream films- market based

Word of mouth




Awards and its function as the signal of quality

The 'selected' are producers of cultural products
The 'selectors' evaluate the quality of those products : they determine the value as jury

The role of awards as a signaling device seems particularly important in the cultural industries,
where the actual quality of products is often difficult to determine prior to consumption
● composition of the jury selecting the award winners to be an important determinant of an
award’s effectiveness.

Juries can be composed of consumers, expert or peers. Selection system theory (three ideal
types of product selection) is used to determine how consumers normally select among
available products.
1. Market/consumer selection
2. Expert selection
3. Peer selection

Empirical setting … U.S. motion picture industry
● clear example of an experience product
○ This increases the importance of signals of quality that consumers can take into
account in their decision whether or not to view a particular movie

Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?

Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.

Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?

Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.

Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?

Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer ArisMaya. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.

Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?

Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für $8.43. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.

Kann man Stuvia trauen?

4.6 Sterne auf Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45.681 Zusammenfassungen wurden in den letzten 30 Tagen verkauft

Gegründet 2010, seit 15 Jahren die erste Adresse für Zusammenfassungen

Starte mit dem Verkauf

Kürzlich von dir angesehen


$8.43
  • (0)
In den Einkaufswagen
Hinzugefügt