This will go over Article 6 Essay Plan and Layout with case law.
When doing a HR Scenario you will not use all of the essay plan, but rather the parts which are relevant to the scenario.
INTRODUCTION
Article 6(1) states that everyone has the right to have a fair trial in both civil and criminal
trials.
The key provision goes over:
access to a court
equality of arms
presumption of innocence
right to silence
right to legal representation
oral hearing
evidence
reasons for a decision
within a reasonable time
independent and impartial hearing
If any of those are restricted the courts will need to ask:
1. Is there a public interest in the restriction? (protect vulnerable, nation security issue)
2. Is the restriction in proportion to the aim? (not too strict, no blanket ban,
challenge?)
POTENTIAL RESTRICTIONS
Access to Court
There can be various restrictions put on when trying to bring a case to the courts, these are:
1) Limitation periods (time to bring a case to court, PI – 3 months, property – 6 months)
2) Vexatious litigants (limit the people to continually try to bring a case to court)
3) Judicial immunity (cannot bring a Judge to court for a court ruling)
4) Police negligent cases (Police immune from negligent claims, but Osman v UK
showed that they are not allowed a ‘blanket ban’ from bringing all cases)
Equality of Arms
When brining a case to trial there must be a fair balance between both parties and they
should not have a great advantage over the accused.
However, in the case of A-G Ref 82 2000, it showed us that the equality of arms does not
have to be completely equal. Yet there is a boundary to this, in Steel and Morris v UK, we
saw that Steel and Morris were representing themselves against McDonald ’s legal team
therefore, resulting in a unfair balance of equality of arms.
Prosecution must also disclose all evidence that they have against the defendant.
Restrictions to Equality of Arms
National Security: may not disclose all evidence, can appoint special advocate,
Children: T and T v UK, steps can be taken to ensure they are not given an intimidating trial
Presumption of Innocence
The burden is for the prosecution to prove that the defendant is guilty not the defence to
prove their innocence.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller joshuaholtz1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.33. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
