100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
AQA ECON 3: Assess the view that wide wage differentials are good for the economy and that governments should therefore play no part in deciding wage rates$5.24
Add to cart
Unit 3 ECON3 - Economics: Business Economics and the Distribution of Income
Answers
AQA ECON 3: Assess the view that wide wage differentials are good for the economy and that governments should therefore play no part in deciding wage rates
Unit 3 ECON3 - Economics: Business Economics and the Distribution of Income
Institution
AQA
Full mark essay on wage differentials in preparation for ECON3 AQA microeconomics.
Question: Assess the view that wide wage differentials are good for the economy and that governments should therefore play no part in deciding wage rates
assess the view that wide wage differentials are good for the economy and that governments should therefore play no part in deciding wage rates
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
Economics
Unit 3 ECON3 - Economics: Business Economics and the Distribution of Income
All documents for this subject (7)
6
reviews
By: freddiecoulson • 2 year ago
By: callumburns • 4 year ago
By: gabrielhamish • 5 year ago
By: ajdobrov2001 • 5 year ago
By: ronitnair25 • 5 year ago
By: deanef • 7 year ago
Seller
Follow
maxthornton
Reviews received
Content preview
Assess the view that wide wage differentials are good for the economy and that governments
should therefore play no part in deciding wage rates [25 marks]
Wage differentials, defined as the variance of wages between different occupations in the UK labour
market, have always existed in the economy. However, the outrageous salaries enjoyed by CEO’s of
FTSE-100 companies have attracted particularly attention in recent years, leading many to call for
government intervention. In fact in 1999, CEO’s of FTSE-100 companies were paid on average 69
times the average salary. By 2010 the multiple was 145 and on current trends it will be 214 by 2020,
or around £8m a year. While it is generally accepted that governments should attempt to reduce
inequalities and alleviate absolute poverty to some extent, market economists argue that wage
differentials are essential to achieving efficient resource allocation in the market. Thus, according to
this view, any government intervention will cause an inefficient allocation of resources, and thus
intervention should be kept to a bare minimum. While there are clear moral arguments to counter
this view, there are also strong economic arguments.
The most popular argument against government intervention in deciding wage rates is that the
market mechanism works successfully. Free market economists argue that the UK is a meritocracy,
and thus for it to work correctly, those who work harder and are more innovative should receive
higher wages. The prospect of gaining a higher wage incentivises workers to work harder, and also
encourages innovation and enterprise. This is because those who are more productive or
entrepreneurial will have a higher marginal revenue product (MRP), will be in higher demand, and
thus will enjoy a higher wage. Thus, government intervention to reduce wage differentials will
discourage workers to raise their MRP levels and lead to a fall in worker productivity. Moreover,
inequality is necessary to encourage entrepreneurs to take risks and set up new business. Without
the prospect of substantial rewards, there would be little incentive to take risks and invest in new
business opportunities. This will have a negative impact on the UK economy, slowing economic
growth through the decrease in the potential productive efficiency of the economy. Free market
economists thus argue that government intervention will have the opposite of the desired effect; a
slower underlying rate of economic growth in the economy will act to increase absolute poverty (or
at least slow down the rate at which absolute poverty is reduced.)
The most common counter to this argument is simple – the market mechanism does not work
correctly when it comes to wages, it is a market failure. As Wilkinson & Pickett argue in Spirit Level,
many wage differentials come not from pure market forces, but through rent seeking or market
manipulation. There is certainly much truth to this argument. Rent seeking, defined as obtaining
money by manipulating the social or political environment in which economic activity takes place, is
certainly the cause for many wage differentials. Indeed, the motive of trade unions is not to achieve
overall economic efficiency, but to champion the interests of their members. As a result, trade
unions and big business have the ability to manipulate wage rates, causing wage differentials which
do not necessarily represent the most efficient allocation of resources. Thus government
intervention in deciding wage rates may not necessarily be detrimental to economic efficiency.
Likewise, interventionists argue that despite recent equal pay legislation (particularly the 2010
Equality Act), inequality in income still results from discrimination on the grounds of gender, race or
sexual orientation etc. Although it is difficult to empirically measure the wage gap resulting from
discrimination, ONS data from 2014 shows that the hourly wage of females is at 79% of male earning
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maxthornton. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
