Very condensed revision notes on Women as part of the OCR History Course on Civil Rights in the USA.
IDEAL for revision and for writing essays. Got me 100 UMS.
See bundle for entire course notes. More than 50% off.
Political:
Suffrage campaign (post-war): got 19th A in 1920, valuable exp. BUT: AWSA vs NWSA 1869, but
make NAWSA 1890 (none are women’s groups) vs Alice Paul’s militant CUWS 1914. Divided: NAOWS
1911 Josephine Dodge anti-vote. Never a mass movement, largely white and middle class. 100k in
1915 = half temperance. Political interest remained limited (many voted same way as husband) and
representation only slowly increased. Excluded un-‘neutralised’ immigrants and AA women de facto
couldn’t assert their rights in South.
ERA campaign 1923-1969: BUT: nothing achieved, divided over where to go next after franchise, not
a mass movement. Although passed Congress in 1972, clear wouldn’t be ratified by 1979. 1972:
Schlafly founded National Committee to Stop ERA
New Deal: Frances Perkins SoLabor 1933, Eleanor Roosevelt joined WTUL BUT: only 9 women in
politics, Perkins appointment triggered negative reaction = indicative of unchanged attitudes.
Post-New Deal: BUT: influence diminished, ERA continued to be opposed post-war, only 11 women
in Congress in 1969, women lost influence in social policy as males increasingly becoming social
academics/social workers
1960s: BUT: women had the vote but still no powerful political voice
1970s-90s: more politically aware and those putting themselves forward for election 1968: 20 to
1990: 78. Steinem’s NWPC 1971 encouraged women into politics. 1992: YotW = 47 in House, 7 in
Senate. Parties finally courting female vote: Democrats 1974 Equal Credit Opportunity Act BUT:
ambitious women still tended to pursue careers in law/medicine. Republicans still opposed e.g. Bush
vetoed federal paid parental leave bill. 1992: limited progress, no significant power base in political
spheres.
Social:
Growth of middle class: less ‘daily grind’, birth rate for whites down BUT: not for religious/ethnics
Hull House 1889: Jane Addams, supported immigrants, influential pressure group re: slum housing
Temperance: galvanised women, WCTU (Frances Willard) 1874 1900: 7,000 branches, Women’s
Crusade 1873, ASL (not just women) 1893 allied with WCTU = 18th A in Dec 1917. WONPR (Pauline
Sabin) 1929, 1.5m members 1931 = 21st A in 1933, women played vital role BUT: restricted to social
sphere concept, predominately middle-class movement, other factors e.g. nativism (alcohol =
immigrants), anti-German (breweries)/ business pressures, lack of tax revenue
Birth control: Sanger clinic 1916 in NY, ABCL 1921, legal clinic 1923, 1924: ABCL = 27.5k members
BUT: only over 8 states, contraceptives still cost = bad for ethnics/poors, still under state law
1920s boom: like S1 point, credit and consumer goods, easier life for some (white) women BUT:
ethnics? ‘Flapper’ movement was not widespread social revolution, no lasting impact.
Great Depression: BUT: social conditions worsened and women expected to give up job
New Deal: BUT: policies did little/nothing to tackle discrimination
WWII: 75% women wanted to stay employed post-war = shifting attitudes towards separate spheres
BUT: Spock’s book 1946 sold 23m copies, and media reinforced spheres
New Feminism: 1963 Betty Friedan’s Feminine Mystique – erosion of “comfortable concentration
camps”, 1966 NOW formed, Aug 1970 Women’s Strike for Equality. Gloria Steinem Jan 1972 ‘Ms’,
200k circulation by end of 1972, separate spheres being eroded, 1986: 56% women considered
themselves feminists. BUT: new, controversial movement proved divisive – mass of normal women
didn’t see how demands affected their lives, alienated men and 1972: only 33% men supported
gender equality, only 40% in 1990. Movement fragmented e.g. Radicalesbians and The Feminists
(called for abolition of marriage).
Abortion: Friedan founded NARAL 1969 pro-abortion, Roe v Wade 1973 established right to abort.
Democrats v Republicans, brought the issue into political spheres – still rages today. BUT: divided =
Phyllis Schlafly NRLC
Economic:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maxthornton. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
