WHAT THEORY IS NOT (Sutton & Staw, 1995)
1) References (need to make arguments by explaining & linking concepts and causal logic from references | NE
listing references to existing theories or mentioning their names)
2) Data (need to explain the logical reasoning/ why a particular finding occurred/ why certain empirical relationships
are expected in the future | NE prior findings cannot motivate H / reporting of results)
3) Constructs/Variables - (need to know why these come about/ why they are connected | important parts of
theory but not alone because NE simply listing a set of antecedents)
4) Diagrams/ Research models (need for explain a logic underlying the portrayed relationships- why proposed
connections will be observed/ verbal explanation about why a phenomenon occurs and unfolds)
5) Hypothesis/ Predictions- important parts of theory as crucial bridges between theory and data by making
explicit how variables and relationships will be operationalised(need to contain logical arguments/ underlying logic
about why empirical relationships are expected to occur | NE concise statements about what i expected to occur)
Other findings: Lack of consensus on what strong theory is may explain why it is difficult to develop a strong theory - building
theory is full of internal conflicts and contradictions | Difficult to master both theory building and testing (theory & methods)-
building research teams with complementary skills
What Theory is Theory Building Blocks
Ways of thinking for theory building (a- Observational thinking/ b-
Conceptual thinking)
a- Inductive: observation leads to theory formation (more qualitative) |
based on practise
b- Deductive: analyses of data leads to theory testing (more
quantitative) | based on literature & logic
LECTURE 2- RESEARCH ETHICS & INTEGRITY
Ethics: is moral philosophy (right or wrong behaviour)/ moral principle/ code
of conduct that governs how people act or behave / principles of a group,
profession, country (principles are time dependent) / personal principles (not everyone has the same principles)
Fields: Business ethics: focusing on problems in business environments | Research ethics: ethical dilemmas and integrity
in scientific research sometimes discipline dependent
, Not everything that is legal is also ethical (and vice versa)
Ethics in research
- Set by various institutions and professional associations (e.g VSNU, NWO, code of ethics, …)
- Four pillars of EiR: (1) professional self-regulation (academy of management, association of information systems,
association of marketing) | (2) government oversights (legislation) | (3) institutional policies | 4) personal
responsibility
- Respect of persons: you need to respect people who you are researching for / informed-voluntary consent / avoid
unnecessary mental or physical suffering/ anonymity / approval by institutions
Research Misconduct
- (1) Disrespecting human subjects pressure to participate/ not informing participants about the study objectives/ not
respecting anonymity / abuse vulnerable people (children-elders) | (2) fabrication (making up data-results and
record-report them) | (3) falsification (manipulating data, changing-omitting-excluding results- not accurate
research- not linking between data & results) | (4) plagiarism (appropriate someone’s ideas- words without credit-
references- verbal or written)
Principles of Research Integrity
- (1) Honesty (clear link between resources & data - connected to falsification and fabrication) | (2) Scrupulousness
(using methods that are accepted in the field - scientific of scholarly/ applied in a responsible manner) | (3)
Transparency (clear what is the data/ how it was obtained/ how the results were achieved/ how it can be used-
open data) | (4) Independence (the research is not biased/ influenced by external or personal factors) | (5)
Responsibility (acknowledge that the work is not done in isolation/ relevant research)
CITI (Research Misconduct | Plagiarism | Privacy and Confidentiality | Data Management)
RESEARCH MISCONDUCT:
Is defined as Fabrication/ Falsification/ Plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research
results.
Why it occurs: Individual/ Organisational (lack of an ethical climate & enforcement within an organisation)/ Related
factors (ease with which researchers and others can copy text or manipulate data)
Other problematic research behaviours:
Effects: Societies | Trainees, Researchers, and Their Organisations
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dimitrispoulidis. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.