100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
frustration in contract law $9.82   Add to cart

Class notes

frustration in contract law

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A concise and detailed set of notes covering frustration in contract law, covering various key principles and going over key cases.

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • July 7, 2023
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Guy blundell
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Frustration
 Breach- fail to perform obligations under the contract, or refuses to perform or
provides defective performance, and does not have a lawful excuse for the breach.
 High threshold for frustration- excuse liability
 Situation arises after contract is made.
 Makes contract “impossible” or illegal to perform.
 Must cause fundamental change to parties’ obligations.
 Not caused by either party and not foreseeable

 Force majeure clause
- Enables parties to make provision for what should happen if particulate events
happen.
- Usually states that particular events do not give rise to breach and that parties
are not entitled to discharge the contract unless the events continue beyond a
certain time.
- Allows parties can exercise contract as to what will and what won’t happen in
unforeseen circumstances.
- Both parties must follow the clause provided for the specific event
- Jackson v Union Marine Insurance
 Ship ran aground, repairs took 8 months to complete.
 Accident was more extensive than what was provided for in the force
majeure clause, so it didn’t apply.
 Clause covered accidents but not extensive delays.
Subject matter has been destroyed/ is no longer available.
 Taylor v Caldwell
- Claimant hired hall from defendant.
- Fire destroyed the hall.
- Claimant sued for non-performance.
- Defence was that the hall was destroyed so couldn’t perform obligation.
Personal services
 Death or illness may give rise to frustration.
 Will depend on nature of contract and surrounding circumstances.
 Condor v The Barron Knights
Supervening illegality
 Law changes after contract is formed.
 If performed in accordance with the contract terms, it would be illegal.
 Fibrosa v Fairbain Lawson (1943)
 Islamic Republic or Iran Shipping Lines v Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association
(2010)
Frustration of purpose

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller harrietmmacpherson. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57727 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.82
  • (0)
  Add to cart