Essay
Unit 23 P8
- Course
- Institution
Essay of 3 pages for the course Unit 23 - Aspects of the Legal System and Law-making Process at PEARSON (Unit 23 P8)
[Show more]
2 reviews
By: Masyn • 7 year ago
By: krusharlidabasia • 7 year ago
Seller
Follow
Businesslevel3provisions
Reviews received
Content preview
IntroductionIn this task I am required explain the rules of statutory interpretation.
Literal rule
The literal rule of statutory interpretation should be the first rule applied by judges. Under the
literal rule, the words of the statute are given their natural or ordinary meaning and applied
without the judge seeking to put a gloss on the words or seek to make sense of the statute.
Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394
The defendant had a flick knife displayed in his shop window with a price tag on it. Statute
made it a criminal offence to 'offer' such flick knives for sale. His conviction was quashed as
goods on display in shops are not 'offers' in the technical sense but an invitation to treat. The
court applied the literal rule of statutory interpretation.
Advantages of the literal rule
Restricts the role of the judge
Provides no scope for judges to use their own opinions or prejudices
Upholds the separation of powers
Recognises Parliament as the supreme law maker
Disadvantages of the literal rule
Creates awkward precedents which require Parliamentary time to correct
Fails to recognise the complexities and limitations of English language
Undermines public confidence in the law
Mischief rule
The mischief rule of statutory interpretation is the oldest of the rules. The mischief rule was
established in Heydon's Case [1584] EWHC Exch J36 Case summary. In Re Sussex Peerage,
it was held that the mischief rule should only be applied where there is ambiguity in the
statute. Under the mischief rule the role is to suppress the mischief the Act is aimed at and
advance the remedy.
Royal College of Nursing v DHSS [1981] 2 WLR 279
The Royal College of Nursing brought an action challenging the legality of the involvement
of nurses in carrying out abortions. The Offences Against the Person Act 1861 makes it an
offence for any person to carry out an abortion. The Abortion Act 1967 provided that it
would be an absolute defence for a medically registered practitioner (ie a doctor) to carry out
abortions provided certain conditions were satisfied. Advances in medical science meant
surgical abortions were largely replaced with hormonal abortions and it was common for
these to be administered by nurses.
1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Businesslevel3provisions. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now