100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
LML4806 Assignment 1 Semester 2 - 2023 $8.97
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. LML4806 - Company Law

Exam (elaborations)

LML4806 Assignment 1 Semester 2 - 2023
 0 purchase
  • Course
  • LML4806 - Company Law
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)

LML4806 Assignment 1 Semester 2 - 2023 Question: 1 Shareholders’ resolutions must usually be voted on at properly constituted meetings of the company’s shareholders. However, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 provides for an exception to this general rule. Explain what this exception under the Co...

[Show more]
Last document update: 1 year ago

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

Document information

  • July 22, 2023
  • July 22, 2023
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • lml4806 assignment 1 semester 2 2023

Written for

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • LML4806 - Company Law
All documents for this subject (179)

Seller

avatar-seller
GetItRight

Reviews received

Content preview

LML4806
Assignment 1 Semester 2 – 2023
Unique Number: NA

Question: 1

Shareholders’ resolutions must usually be voted on at properly constituted
meetings of the company’s shareholders. However, the Companies Act 71 of
2008 provides for an exception to this general rule. Explain what this exception
under the Companies Act 71 of 2008 entails. (5)

Common law

In terms of the common law shareholders’ resolutions can be adopted without holding
a general meeting.

This can be done by unanimous assent provided that: - all shareholders are fully aware
of the facts – all shareholders assented to.

Gohlke and Schneider v Westies Minerals (Pty) Ltd 1970 (2) SA 685 (A). the court held
that members may validly appoint a director to the board without any formal meeting
having been held if there is evidence of their unanimous consent. In re Duomatic Ltd
[1969] 1 All ER 161 (ch). held that the unanimous approval of directors’ remuneration
by the two directors holding all the voting shares in a company could be regarded as
a resolution of a general meeting approving the payment.

Section 60 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (round robin or written resolutions)

Section 60 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 is an alternative to the doctrine of
unanimous assent to validly pass a resolution of shareholders outside a properly
constituted meeting provided that certain formalities have been complied with.

, In terms of section 60:

• A resolution may be submitted to shareholders in writing.
• The resolution must be adopted in writing by the required majority to pass the
particular type of resolution.
• If a resolution is passed in this manner, it has the same effect as a resolution
adopted at a duly convened meeting.
• However, any matters that in terms of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 or the
Memorandum of Incorporation of a company must be dealt with at the annual
general meeting of a company, may not be dealt with in terms of the procedures
set out in section 60.



Question: 2

David is a non-executive director and chairperson of Free State Airlines SOC
Ltd, a company that operates commercial flights between Johannesburg and
Bloemfontein. David is also one of the major shareholders of Aerial Lease (Pty)
Ltd, an aircraft leasing company. In a meeting chaired by David, and by a
resolution proposed and supported by David, the board of directors of Free
State Airlines SOC Ltd decides to lease three commercial aircrafts from Aerial
Lease (Pty) Ltd. David does not inform the other directors of Free State Airlines
SOC Ltd about his existing shareholding in Aerial Lease (Pty) Ltd. The entire
board of directors of Free State Airlines SOC Ltd considers and approves the
relevant lease agreement with Aerial Lease (Pty) Ltd. However, the other
directors of Free State Airlines SOC Ltd subsequently become aware of David’s
shareholding in Aerial Lease (Pty) Ltd and they now want to retract the lease
agreement.

With reference to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008,
advise the board of directors of Free State Airlines SOC Ltd on the following
matters:

2.1 Whether David has breached any specific duty that he owes to Free State
Airlines SOC Ltd by not informing the board of directors about his
shareholding in Aerial Lease (Pty) Ltd. (10)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GetItRight. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$8.97
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added