100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Executive Dominance $3.92   Add to cart

Class notes

Executive Dominance

1 review
 63 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Executive Dominance

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • April 15, 2017
  • 2
  • 2014/2015
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: jwishart786 • 6 year ago

avatar-seller
With reference to the source and any other relevant information you have studied,
discuss the extent to which the Constitution has failed in its aim of preventing executive
dominance in the US. (30 marks).

Paragraph Key Points Key Cases
Intro  55 FF - determined President restrained by  Article 3 - established independent
Constitution - avoid repeat of tyrannical rule judiciary - free from executive
similar to King George III. interference - unafraid bring full force of
 Achieved by amalgam of factors - SOP, checks and the law on all US Executive members
balance, federalism + independent S.C. including president.
 Quote source.  However, commentators - argue
 FF - set up singular executive - impressive list of expanding dimensions White House
powers - Article 2, careful to balance these - building - symbolic of the massive growth
Congress - series of checks to use against - found in power + scope of the executive.
in Article 1.  Worry President - came to dominate the
 Principle SOP - French philosopher, Montesquieu political landscape.
- three branches = separate personnel - avoids  Has the Constitution prevented executive
conflict of interest + independent from one dominance?
another but interdependent.
 Means no branch - unilaterally.
 Article 4 + Amendment 10 = combine establish
federalist division of power between national
government + capital + state gov. - ensures
swathe of jurisdiction was beyond presidents
legislative reach.
Paragraph 1  C+B’s – Congress possess – can + frequently –  President - dominate legislative agenda –
amend, delay + reject executive sponsored bills fair to say Congress + its committees =
from the White House. formidable obstacle. (Life and death over
 Diluted version – Obama’s Healthcare Reform Bill bills).
passed in - Congress enforced unwanted  Congress – 2/3’s majority both houses –
amendments. over-ride presidential veto = bill brought
 Senate Bill – avoid US falling off the ‘fiscal cliff’ back to live and passing it into law.
approved by Obama - went to the ‘eleventh hour’.  This goes against Presidents wishes –
 September, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) engaged in a happened twice to Bill Clinton, 1995
hours - 21 hours + 19 minute filibuster – strip Securities Bill.
funding the Obamacare bill.  Critics – Congress point out Clinton used
 Constitution grants Senate unlimited powers of veto without being overridden 34 times in
debate – led to ‘talkathons’ –block legislation – 9 years.
talk bill to death = serious delays.  Fear President revenge by with-holding
 Obama’s “carried interest” tax bill 2012 – ‘pork’ – federal contracts for
rejected Senate despite Obama’s own Democrat districts/states usually enough ensures
Party – slim majority in chamber. bills death.

Paragraph 2  Congress- "power of the purse".  Senate - confirm or reject executive
 Can reject the annual budget - Appropriations appointments. Bush 2005 nominee - S.C.
Committees approve the itemised spending - vacancy - withdrew - influential Senate
individual departments. Judiciary Committee refused to
 Congressional budgetary oversight - 2003 recommend her - full house.
G.W.Bush - $700bn tax cut - settle for $350bn.  Congress - prevent executive dominance
 Critics - lacks of check - foreign policy - seeks 2/3's - impeachment, trial + removal.
majority - Senate treaties foreign nations = long  Any member - accused but in history -1
delays or outright rejection. cabinet office, W.Belknap 1876 + two
 Case with Clinton's Comprehensive Test Ban presidents, A.Johnson 1868 + B.Clinton
Treaty 1999. 1999 = impeached but acquitted.
 Threat of near certain impeachment -
Richard Nixon resignation in 1974 -
'Watergate Scandal' - presence of Article
II = deterrent presidential behaviour.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MarkC57. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.92
  • (1)
  Add to cart