100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Business Strategy & Sustainability: Summary Paper Week 4 $4.29
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Business Strategy & Sustainability: Summary Paper Week 4

 258 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of all papers for week 4. 1. Mitchell, Agle & Wood (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts 2. Jensen (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function 3. Spar & La Mure (2003) T...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 7  pages

  • April 17, 2017
  • 7
  • 2016/2017
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Only questions
avatar-seller
Business Strategy & Sustainability: Paper Summaries
Week 4: Stakeholders: companies and nongovernmental organizations

4.1. Mitchell, Agle & Wood (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:
defining the principle of who and what really counts

 Stakeholder theory offers variety of signals on how questions of stakeholder identification might be answered
o Needed  theory of stakeholder salience that can explain to whom and what managers actually pay
attention
 Stakeholder in theory
o Freeman: ‘’any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of organ’s
objective
o Classes of stakeholders can be identified by possession of one, two or three of following:
 1) stakeholder’s power to influence firm
 2) legitimacy of stakeholder’s relationship with firm
 3) urgency of stakeholder’s claim on firm
o To achieve certain ends, managers pay certain kinds of attention to certain kinds of stakeholders
 Argument proceeds as follows
o 1st  review stakeholder literature
 show positions on ‘’Principle of Who or What Really Counts?’’
o 2nd  defense of three key attributes (power, legitimacy, urgency) as identifiers of stakeholders
o 3rd  introduce managers and salience into the discussion and present analysis of the stakeholder
classes that result from possession of 1, 2 or 3 of these attributes
o 4th  illustrate theory’s dynamic qualities by showing how stakeholders can shift from one class to
another


4.2. Jensen (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function

 Governance at lvl of individual organ: What are we trying to accomplish? How do we keep score?
o social lvl: If we could dictate the criterion or objective function to be maximized by firms, what would
it be?
 How do we want firms in our economy to measure their own performance?
 Normal corporate objective  value maximization (LT market value of firm)
o Main contender = stakeholder theory (account for interests of all stakeholders in a firm)
o Should not be viewed as contender, fails to provide complete specification of purpose or objective
function
o Maximization = a single objective, stakeholder = ‘’many masters’’
 Stakeholder will lead to confusion, too many objectives, conflict, inefficiency…
 United – to maximize value, managers have to satisfy and enlist support of all stakeholders
o Top management plays critical role for company’s strategic vision
 New corp objective function:
o Enlightened value maximization = much of structure of stakeholder theory, but accepts
maximization of LR value of firm as criterion for making requisite tradeoffs among its stakeholders
o Enlightened stakeholder theory = focus attention on meeting demands of all important corp
constituencies, specifies LT value maximization as firm’s objective
 Clear way for managers to think about and make tradeoffs among corp stakeholders
Logical Structure of Problem
 1. Purposeful behavior requires existence of a single-valued objective function
o at some point increases in MS come at expense of profits (R&D, ads, price reductions…)
 can’t maximize profits and MS at same time
 no purposeful way of deciding balance
o logically impossible to maximize in more than one dimension at the same time

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller pietrongr. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.29
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added