These documents are structured in a way that you can easily understand the content; each sub-topic will begin with AO1 and then the AO3. They contain everything you need for your exams and cover everything in the specification.
These are detailed and concise notes created using the 'psychboost' ...
Social influence
Types of and explanations for conformity:
Conformity = is a change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined
pressure from a person or group of people
Kelman (1958) suggested three levels of conformity:
Compliance (shallow)
Identification (intermediate)
Internalisation (deep)
Compliance – agreeing with the group but keeping personal opinions. Results in a temporary
change in behaviour
Identification – we value membership of a group so we will conform to their behaviour or ideas
to be a part of the groups, even if we don’t fully agree
Internalisation – deepest level of conformity. Personal opinions genuinely change to match the
groups. This is a permanent change in beliefs
There are two explanations for conformity:
Informational social influence (ISI)
Normative social influence (NSI)
Information social influence (ISI):
- In situations when the correct behaviour is uncertain, we look to the majority for
guidance on how to behave because we want to be correct
- ISI often results in internalisation, permanently adopting views of the majority
Normative social influence (NSI):
- In situations when the individual wants to appear normal and be one of the majority, so
they are approved and not rejected.
- NSI often results in compliance, or a superficial change in behaviour
,Evaluative Research:
Supporting evidence for NSI from Asch,
When given an unambiguous line length test pps would choose incorrect answers when
the incorrect answer was selected by confederates.
When interviewed afterwards pps said they conformed to avoid rejection by others.
This shows that people will show compliant behaviour in order to fit in and be approved
by the majority
However:
- The task in Asch’s line experiment was unusual and not like a task performed in day-to-
day life therefore lacks mundane realism
- It could be argued that conformity would act differently in real life
Supporting evidence for ISI by Jenness 1932…
Who asked pps first alone, then in groups, then make a second guess alone, the number
of jelly beans in a jar.
This is an ambiguous task, there is no obvious correct answer.
Jenness found that the individuals second guess would move closer to the groups guess
demonstrating ISI with women conforming more
However,
- The task in jenness’s experiment was unusual and not like a task performed in day-to-
day life, therefore lacks mundane realism.
- It could be argued that conformity would act differently in real world situations
Evaluation A03
, Strength of NSI is that there is research support
Asch (1951) found many pps conformed rather than give the correct answer because
they were afraid of disapproval
When pps wrote down answers (no normative pressure), conformity fell to 12.5%
This shows that at least some conformity is due to a desire not to be rejected by the
group for disagreeing with them
Limitation is individual differences in NSI
- Some people are concerned about being liked by others – nAfiliators have a strong need
for ‘affiliation’ (need to relate to other people)
- McGhee and Teevan (1967) found that students who were nAfifiliatord were more likely
to conform
- This shows NSI underlies conformity for some people more than for others – an
individual difference not explained by a theory of situational pressures
Strength is research support for ISI
Lucas et al (2006) found pps conformed more to incorrect answers when maths
problems were difficult
For hard problems, the situation was ambiguous so they relied on the answers they were
given
This supports ISI because the results are what ISI would predict
However..
- It is unclear if NSI or ISI operate studies and real life. A dissenter may reduce the power
of NSI (social support) or reduce the power of ISI
- Therefore ISI and NSI are hard to separate and operate together in most real-world
situations
Variables affecting conformity - Asch
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SanM192. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.