100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary A/A* notes social psychology $7.09   Add to cart

Summary

Summary A/A* notes social psychology

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

a detailed and complete summary of social psychology, covering everything needed to pass the exam with an excellent grade and percentage a short and complete summary of : -theories -key studies - practical -evaluation

Preview 4 out of 33  pages

  • July 27, 2023
  • 33
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Social psychology

Date: 12/10/22


Comparing agency theory and social impact theory

Agency theory emphasizes the role of evolution and socialization on determining
obedience, whereas social impact theory focuses on the interaction of social forces as
social determinants of obedience.

Agency theory specifically focuses on obedience, in contrast to social impact theory
which can be applied to any social situation including obedience, as it looks at the
functioning of individuals in the presence of others.

Agency theory doesn’t take into account individual differences like personality and is
more descriptive rather than explanatory. Saying that people obey because they are
agents to authority doesn’t add much to the explanation, if that is the definition of
obedience. Similarly, social impact theory doesn’t take into account individual
differences and oversimplifies the nature of human behaviour through viewing people
as passive receivers of others’ behaviour towards themselves.

Social impact theory (Bibb Latane’ 1981)

Looks at how people are influenced by the actions of others and how this affects the
way they think and behave = social impact - how the presence of others (real, imagined,
implied) impacts us.

, 2

Target : the person being socially impacted

Source: the influencer

Multiplicative effect

Strength: determined by status, authority and age of source.

Immediacy: proximity/distance to source

Number: of targets and sources or presence of buffers that could act as barriers to
distance.

Divisional effect

Social pressure splits up among more targets. The number of targets to be influenced
affects the impact of the source.

Supporting evidence

Milgram’s variation #17 had 2 rebel peer confederates with teacher that refused to
continue.

Obedience dropped to 10%.

This shows that other individuals impact behavior as opposed to when alone-supporting
the divisional effect.

Conflicting evidence

Ignores individual differences: views people as passive receivers of others’ behavior.

Some are more resistant to social impact than others.

Oversimplifies the nature of human behavior/interaction.

Other explanations

In Milgram’s variation #10, obedience was lower in a run-down office block than at Yale
University.

Agency theory explains this through the prestige (legitimacy) of the setting adding to
status of authority, but social impact theory cannot.

, 3

Moral strain of participants in Milgram’s original experiment was explained in Agency
theory but not in social impact theory that considers only disobedience and obedience
but nothing in between.

Usefulness

Latane’ s mathematical formula allows us to predict whether laws will be followed from
knowing the number of people, the immediacy of order and strength of authority figure.

Testable

Limited to 1 type of social interaction : no prediction of what will happen if 2 equal
groups impact on one another.

Target and source interaction can’t be explained (not certain if principles of this theory
would apply in such cases).

Agency theory (Milgram 1963)

When people obey orders, they don’t feel responsible for their actions but act as agents
for authority figures, even if they act against their own moral values.

Moral strain: experiencing anxiety by doing something that goes against your moral
judgment since you feel powerless in disobeying.

Due to binding agents/factors that increase legitimacy of authority, we remain in an
agentic state to shift authority for consequences of our actions on the authority figure
and deny the severity of the resulting damage, reducing moral strain.

Agentic state: allowing others to direct our actions and passing off responsibility to
those giving orders. Acting as agents for authority figures.

- Person giving orders must be perceived as legitimate authority
- Person being ordered must believe that the authority will accept responsibility for
their actions.

Autonomous state: acting according to your own values, taking responsibility for the
results of your actions.

Supporting evidence

Milgram's original experiment supports agency theory as participants showed signs of
moral strain and during debrief, they stated that the experimenter would have taken

, 4

responsibility for their actions and that they didn’t want to administer potentially lethal
shocks.

This provides evidence for the concept of displacement of responsibility.

Conflicting evidence

No explanation of individual differences (why some obey but others don’t)

Research evidence suggests that dissent occurs due to gender differences, personality
type, situational factors.

Obedience is a more complex process than is being explained by agency theory.

Other explanations

No explanation of motivational issues behind obedience

French and Raven ( 1959) identified 5 bases of power held by individuals determining
obedience shown by group:

Legitimate, Reward. Referent, Expert, Coercive motivate and influence behavior

Better explanation for obedience and Milgram’s findings in his research

Usefulness

Used to explain real-life events involving obedience to authority

Ex. During Vietnam war, village My Lai massacred by American soldiers ordered by
Lieutenant Calley who stated in his court martial that he was just following orders=

Supporting agency theory involving a displacement of responsibility.

Testable

Concepts of autonomy and agency are difficult to define and measure.

Agency is a state of mind switched on when given an order by an authority figure

-this concept is an internal mental process that can’t be directly measured, only inferred
from the behavior of the agent.

Can’t objectively measure agency theory as an explanation for obedience.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller erikakumar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.09
  • (0)
  Add to cart