Samenvatting Arbeid, Gezondheid en Welzijn (slides + lesnotities) inclusief samenvatting van basisartikelen en wetenschappelijke artikelen
Vak gegeven door Prof. Dr. Peter Vlerick
16/20 gehaald met deze samenvatting!
1. Individuele karakteris1eken en werkgedrag ____________________________________ 1
1.1. Inleiding __________________________________________________________________ 1
1.1.1. Conceptueel kader _______________________________________________________________ 1
1.1.2. Enkele vaststellingen ______________________________________________________________ 1
1.2. Objec/eve individuele karakteris/eken en werkuitkomsten _________________________ 1
1.2.1. Lee8ijd ________________________________________________________________________ 1
1.2.1.1. Ageing ____________________________________________________________________ 1
1.2.1.2. Biopsychosociaal model (WHO): ICF & diagnosHek _________________________________ 2
1.2.2. Geslacht (‘gender’) _______________________________________________________________ 2
1.2.3. Etniciteit _______________________________________________________________________ 2
1.2.4. LevenssHjlfactoren _______________________________________________________________ 3
1.3. Subjec/eve individuele karakteris/eken en werkuitkomsten_________________________ 3
1.3.1. Trait-like characterisHcs ___________________________________________________________ 3
1.3.1.1. Toepassing: welke traits hebben ‘selfmade biljonairs gemeenschappelijk? (Simmons, 2018) 3
1.3.2. State-like characterisHcs ___________________________________________________________ 4
1.3.2.1. Psychological Capital (Luthans & Youssef, 2007) ___________________________________ 4
1.3.3. States __________________________________________________________________________ 4
1.3.3.1. Enkele states _______________________________________________________________ 5
1.4. Wetenschappelijk ar/kel: Van de Ven et al., 2013 _________________________________ 5
1.4.1. Possible interacHons ______________________________________________________________ 5
1.4.2. Previous research on the DISC-model ________________________________________________ 5
1.4.3. Gasps and shortcomings in empirical evidence _________________________________________ 5
1.4.4. Conceptual model vs. model of current study __________________________________________ 6
1.4.5. Main hypothesis _________________________________________________________________ 6
1.4.6. Method ________________________________________________________________________ 6
1.4.7. Results ________________________________________________________________________ 6
1.4.8. Plot ___________________________________________________________________________ 7
1.4.9. Conclusion ______________________________________________________________________ 7
1.5. Conclusie _________________________________________________________________ 7
2. Werk-familie interac1e ____________________________________________________ 8
2.1. Inleiding & basisconcepten ___________________________________________________ 8
2.1.1. Geschiedenis ____________________________________________________________________ 8
2.1.2. Werk-familie interacHe: kenmerken __________________________________________________ 8
2.1.3. Expansietheorie van mulHpele rollen (Barneb & Hyde, 2001): principes _____________________ 9
2.1.4. Werk-familie-interacHes: 4 types ____________________________________________________ 9
2.2. Theore/sche modellen ______________________________________________________ 9
2.2.1. ‘Antecedent-Outcome’ modellen ___________________________________________________ 10
2.2.1.1. Conceptueel kader: basisprincipes _____________________________________________ 10
2.2.2. ‘Spillover’ modellen _____________________________________________________________ 10
2.2.2.1. Theorie van ‘work-family enrichment (Greenhaus & Powell, 2006) ___________________ 10
2.2.3. Werk-familie balans _____________________________________________________________ 10
2.3. Antecedenten en gevolgen __________________________________________________ 11
2.3.1. Kernantecedenten van WFC en FWC ________________________________________________ 11
2.3.2. Kernantecedenten van WFE en FWE ________________________________________________ 11
2.3.3. Uitkomsten van WFC en enrichment ________________________________________________ 11
2.3.4. Uitkomsten van WFE_____________________________________________________________ 12
2.4. Omgaan met werk en familiale vereisten _______________________________________ 12
2.4.1. Individuele copingstrategieën _____________________________________________________ 12
1
, 2.4.2. Werk-familie beleid en cultuur _____________________________________________________ 12
2.5. Meten van werk-thuis interac/e ______________________________________________ 12
2.6. Wetenschappelijk ar/kel: Geurts et al.,2005 ____________________________________ 12
2.6.1. Problemen bij het meten van werk-thuisinterferenHe __________________________________ 13
2.7. Wetenschappelijk ar/kel: Spector et al., 2005 ___________________________________ 13
2.7.1. Inleiding_______________________________________________________________________ 13
2.7.2. Methode ______________________________________________________________________ 13
2.7.3. Resultaten _____________________________________________________________________ 13
2.7.4. Discussie ______________________________________________________________________ 15
2.8. Crossover ________________________________________________________________ 15
3. Werkgerelateerd (on)welbevinden __________________________________________ 16
3.1. Inleiding _________________________________________________________________ 16
3.1.1. Het Janusgezicht van werken ______________________________________________________ 16
3.1.2. Enkele mijlpalen ________________________________________________________________ 16
3.1.3. Interesse in psychologisch (on)welzijn _______________________________________________ 16
3.1.4. Maakt arbeid gezond? ___________________________________________________________ 16
3.1.4.1. PosiHeve psychologie _______________________________________________________ 17
A. HumanisHsche psychologie _____________________________________________________ 17
B. Aaron Antonovsky ____________________________________________________________ 17
C. Eustress ____________________________________________________________________ 17
D. OrganisaHepsychologie en management __________________________________________ 17
3.1.4.2. Conclusie _________________________________________________________________ 17
3.1.5. Werkgerelateerd welbevinden? ____________________________________________________ 18
3.1.6. Welbevinden? __________________________________________________________________ 18
3.1.6.1. AffecHeve dimensie _________________________________________________________ 18
3.1.6.2. CogniHeve dimensie ________________________________________________________ 19
3.2. Welzijn op het werk: een taxonomie___________________________________________ 19
3.3. Burnout _________________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.1. Inleiding_______________________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2. Burnout-sumptomen ____________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2.1. Psychische symptomen ______________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2.2. Fysieke symptomen _________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2.3. Gedragssymptomen ________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2.4. Sociale symptomen _________________________________________________________ 19
3.3.2.5. ProblemaHsche aitudes ____________________________________________________ 20
3.3.3. Definiëring van burnout __________________________________________________________ 20
3.3.4. Meten van burnout: Ontwikkeling van de Vlaamse Maslach Burnout Inventory (VMBI) ________ 20
3.3.4.1. Studie 1A: Vlaamse vertaling van MBI __________________________________________ 20
3.3.4.2. Studie 1B: exploraHeve analyse van de factoriële validiteit van de MBI (Vlerick, 1993) ____ 21
3.3.4.3. Studie 1C: analyse van de relaHe tussen de antwoorddimensies _____________________ 22
3.3.4.4. Studie 1D: confirmatorische analyse van de factorstructuur en de validiteit van de MBI
(Vlerick, 1995) _______________________________________________________________________ 22
3.3.4.5. Studie 1E; analyse van de soortgenoot validiteit van de MBI (Vlerick, 2003) ____________ 23
3.3.4.6. Studie 1F: analyse van de externe construct validiteit van de MBI ____________________ 24
3.3.4.7. Algemene conclusie ________________________________________________________ 24
3.3.4.8. Verder psychometrisch MBI-onderzoek _________________________________________ 25
3.3.5. Burnout: antecedenten en gevolgen ________________________________________________ 25
3.3.5.1. PotenHal work-related antecedents of burnout (Peeters et al., 2013) _________________ 25
3.3.6. Burnout: mogelijke verklaringsmechanismen _________________________________________ 25
3.3.7. Burnout-discussies ______________________________________________________________ 26
3.3.7.1. Dimensies ________________________________________________________________ 26
3.3.7.2. Symptomen _______________________________________________________________ 26
2
, 3.3.7.3. Oorsprong ________________________________________________________________ 26
3.3.7.4. Aanpak- en intervenHe ______________________________________________________ 26
3.4. Bevlogenheid (‘Work Engagement’) ___________________________________________ 26
3.4.1. Het definiëren van bevlogenheid ___________________________________________________ 26
3.4.1.1. Bevlogenheid als posiHeve anHthese van burnout (Maslach & Leiter, 1997) ____________ 27
3.4.1.2. Bevlogenheid als apart concept (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2010) _________________________ 27
3.4.2. Het meten van bevlogenheid ______________________________________________________ 27
3.4.3. Bevlogenheid vs. jobsaHsfacHe _____________________________________________________ 27
3.4.4. Bevlogenheid: antecedenten en gevolgen ____________________________________________ 28
3.4.4.1. PotenHal antecedents of work engagement (Peeters et al., 2013) ____________________ 28
3.4.4.2. PotenHal consequences of work engagement (Peeters et al., 2013) __________________ 28
3.4.5. Bevlogenheid: mogelijke verklaringsmechanismen _____________________________________ 28
3.4.6. Bevlogenheid: 8 stellingen ________________________________________________________ 28
3.4.7. Burnout vs. bevlogenheid _________________________________________________________ 29
3.4.8. Epiloog________________________________________________________________________ 29
3.5. Werkverveling (‘Work Boredom’) _____________________________________________ 29
3.5.1. Het definiëren van werkverveling __________________________________________________ 29
3.5.2. Het meten van werkverveling______________________________________________________ 29
3.5.3. Werkverveling: antecedenten en gevolgen ___________________________________________ 29
3.5.3.1. PotenHal antecedents of work boredom (Peeters et al., 2013) _______________________ 29
3.5.3.2. PotenHal consequences of work boredom (Peeters et al., 2013) _____________________ 29
3.5.4. Werkverveling: mogelijke verklaringsmechanismen ____________________________________ 29
3.6. Werkverslaving (‘Workaholism’) ______________________________________________ 30
3.6.1. Inleiding_______________________________________________________________________ 30
3.6.2. Het definiëren van werkverslaving __________________________________________________ 30
3.6.2.1. Scob et al. (1997): drie eisen _________________________________________________ 30
3.6.3. Bevlogenheid vs. werkverslaving ___________________________________________________ 30
3.6.4. Het meten van werkverslaving _____________________________________________________ 30
3.6.4.1. Aantal (over)uren per week __________________________________________________ 30
3.6.4.2. Wetenschappelijk instrument: WART ___________________________________________ 30
3.6.4.3. Wetenschappelijk instrument WorkBat _________________________________________ 31
3.6.5. Werkverslaving: antecedenten en gevolgen __________________________________________ 32
3.6.5.1. Hoe ontstaat werkverlaving? _________________________________________________ 32
3.6.5.2. Gevolgen van werkverslaving _________________________________________________ 32
3.6.6. Besluit: de toekomst van werkverslaving _____________________________________________ 33
3.7. Jobtevredenheid (‘Job Sa/sfac/on’) ___________________________________________ 33
3.8. Individuele verschillen ______________________________________________________ 33
3.8.1. Common individual differences of employee well-being (Peeters et al., 2013) _______________ 33
3.8.2. Specific individual differences and employee well-being (Peeters et al., 2013) _______________ 33
3.9. Conclusie: mo[o __________________________________________________________ 34
3.10. Werkgerelateerd (on)welbevinden in de gezondheidszorg: onderzoek________________ 34
3.10.1. Conceptueel burnout-model (Vlerick, 1994) _______________________________________ 34
3.10.2. Studie 1: antecedenten bij VK in Vlaamse Algemene ZH ______________________________ 34
3.10.3. Studie 1: gevolgen bij ZHVK _____________________________________________________ 35
3.10.4. Studie 2: burnout bij geriaHsche VK (Piers et al., 2012) _______________________________ 35
3.10.5. Studie 3: burnout in Swedish nursing students (Rudman & Gustavsson, 2012) ____________ 35
3.10.6. Studie 4: Burnout among French emergency physicians (Estryn-Behar et al., 2011) ________ 35
3.10.7. Studie 5: burnout among intensivists in adult ICU’s in French public hospitals (Embriaco et al.,
2007) 36
3.10.8. Studie 6: burnout among German anaesteHsts (Heinke et al., 2011) ____________________ 36
3.10.9. Studie 7: burnout among UK surgeons (Upton et al., 2012) ___________________________ 36
3.10.9.1. Verklaring: mediatoren (Donahue et al., 2012) ___________________________________ 36
3.10.9.2. Burnout-audit _____________________________________________________________ 36
3
, 3.10.9.3. Kenmerken van burnout-intervenHes___________________________________________ 36
3.10.9.4. Adviezen voor de prakHjk: WG ________________________________________________ 37
3.10.9.5. Adviezen voor de prakHjk: WN ________________________________________________ 37
3.10.10. Studie 8: nurses’ work engagement in Israelian reHrement homes (Abdelhadi & Drach-Zahavv,
2011) 37
3.10.10.1. Verklaring: mediatoren (Reijseger et al., 2012) _________________________________ 38
3.10.11. Studie 9: work engagement in UK doctors (Manus et al., 2011) ________________________ 38
3.11. Synthese _________________________________________________________________ 38
3.11.1. Het WEB-model (Bakker et al.,, 2001) _____________________________________________ 38
3.12. Epiloog __________________________________________________________________ 38
4. Jobperforman1e ________________________________________________________ 39
4.1. Warming up ______________________________________________________________ 39
4.2. Werkperforman/e _________________________________________________________ 39
4.3. Wetenschappelijk ar/kel: Wang et al., 2014 _____________________________________ 39
4.3.1. AuthenHc leadership (Walumbwa et al., 2008) ________________________________________ 39
4.3.1.1. KernkarakterisHeken authenHeke leider_________________________________________ 39
4.3.2. ModeraHon role of psychological capital? (Luthans & Youssef, 2004) ______________________ 39
4.3.3. MediaHng role of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)? (Dansereau et al., 1975) _______________ 40
4.3.4. Mediated moderaHon? ___________________________________________________________ 40
4.3.5. Conceptueel onderzoeksmodel & methode __________________________________________ 40
4.3.6. Resultaten _____________________________________________________________________ 40
4.3.6.1. H1 ______________________________________________________________________ 40
4.3.6.2. H2 ______________________________________________________________________ 40
4.3.6.3. H3 ______________________________________________________________________ 40
4.3.6.4. H4 ______________________________________________________________________ 41
4.3.6.5. H5a _____________________________________________________________________ 41
4.3.6.6. H5b _____________________________________________________________________ 41
4.3.7. Discussie ______________________________________________________________________ 41
4.4. Conclusie ________________________________________________________________ 41
5. Psychosociale werkrisico’s: preven1e en interven1e_____________________________ 42
5.1. Arbeidsrisico’s en risicomanagement __________________________________________ 42
5.2. Codex Welzijn op het werk (FOD WASO, 2021) __________________________________ 42
5.3. Top 5 arbeidsrisico’s (ArboNed)_______________________________________________ 42
5.3.1. Psychosocial risks _______________________________________________________________ 42
5.3.2. Psychosocial risk management _____________________________________________________ 42
5.3.2.1. SOBANE – strategie voor risicobeheer (FOD WASO) _______________________________ 43
5.3.2.2. Stress management intervenHon ______________________________________________ 43
5.4. Classificeren van interven/es ________________________________________________ 43
5.4.1. Op basis van doel _______________________________________________________________ 43
5.4.2. Op basis van sHjl/ontwikkelingsfase _________________________________________________ 43
5.4.2.1. Casus: veiligheidsladder _____________________________________________________ 43
5.4.3. Op basis van stressniveau _________________________________________________________ 43
5.4.4. Op basis van target ______________________________________________________________ 43
5.4.5. CriHcal process and contextual factors during intervenHons _____________________________ 44
5.5. Psychosocial safety climate __________________________________________________ 44
5.5.1. PSC-model (Dollard & Bakker, 2010 & Law et al., 2013) _________________________________ 44
5.6. Psychosocial risico’s: knipperlichten (FOD WASO, 2014) ___________________________ 44
5.7. Interven/ons in work & organiza/onal psychology: key ques/ons ___________________ 44
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bovanhecke. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.72. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
