100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Summary AQA ENGLISH LITERATURE CRIME WRITING ESSAY The Murder of Roger Ackroyd – Agatha Christie ‘It is difficult for readers to admire Poirot despite his ability to solve the case.’$7.11
Summary AQA ENGLISH LITERATURE CRIME WRITING ESSAY The Murder of Roger Ackroyd – Agatha Christie ‘It is difficult for readers to admire Poirot despite his ability to solve the case.’
96 views 0 purchase
Course
Elements of Crime Writing
Institution
AQA
Book
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd
AQA ENGLISH LITERATURE CRIME WRITING ESSAY
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd – Agatha Christie ‘It is difficult for readers to admire Poirot despite his ability to solve the case.’ To what extent do you agree with this view? Remember to include in your answer relevant detailed exploration of Chris...
aqa english literature crime writing essay the mur
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
Edition:
ISBN:
Edition:
More summaries for
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd revision booklet: AQA English lit B
A* ENGLISH LITERATURE - MURDER OF ROGER ACKROYD NOTESContext - Golden Age and Locked Room Crime
A* AQA ENGLISH LITERATURE CRIME WRITING PART B COMPARISON OF MURDER OF ROGER ACKROYD AND POETRY ANTHOLOGY ‘In crime writing the crimes committed are due to a personal weakness within the criminal'
All for this textbook (15)
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
English Literature B
Elements of Crime Writing
All documents for this subject (147)
Seller
Follow
ramiriam
Reviews received
Content preview
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd – Agatha
Christie ‘It is difficult for readers to admire
Poirot despite his ability to solve the case.ʼ
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd – Agatha Christie ‘It is difficult for readers to admire Poirot
despite his ability to solve the case.ʼ To what extent do you agree with this view? Remember to
include in your answer relevant detailed exploration of Christieʼs authorial methods. [25 marks]
Poirotʼs investigative method – being hands on/knowledge of human psychology and also
guesses.
Poirot allowing Dr Sheppard to survive undermining his previous actions.
Dr Sheppard fooling the reader and therefore this being mirrored on Poirot making him
seem more genius.
In crime fiction, specifically detective fiction, the crime is supposed to be difficult to solve but
still available for the more insightful and suspecting readers to discover the answers. This
allows the novel to become more interactive so that the audience can act as secondary
detectives when reading the novel. In ‘The Murder of Roger Ackroydʼ, we are presented with the
detective Hercule Poirot whose investigative and method of detection adds an intriguing plot
point to the novel while allowing the reader themselves to string together the clues. However,
some critics have stated that his method is inconsistent and a subversion to crime fiction
tropes. In this essay I will therefore discuss to what extent readers may struggle to admire
Poirot despite his ability to solve the case.
As we are introduced to Poirot in Chapter 3 as ‘The Man Who Grew Vegetable Marrowsʼ he is
immediately presented as a somewhat ridiculous character whose “suspiciously black hair” and
“two immense moustaches” leading to readers and characters ignoring the “pair of watchful
eyes” which hold an immense knowledge of the human psyche. He is introduced in a similar
way to all of his novels, leading to the ‘dramatis personaeʼ around him doubting his detective
ability and ‘wondering if his successes were all a mysterious series of chancesʼ. However, it is
the way in which Poirot transcends all of these doubts reflecting an immense intelligence within
himself which causes the readers to admire him.
Poirot is clearly not just an arm-chair detective as he is willing to literally get his hands dirty in
pursuit of a clue, such as the ring which he finds in the pond, with the inscription ‘from R. March
13thʼ which Ursula Bourne threw away. Much like Sherlock he also uses psychological
knowledge of people to group and identify them. He reveals that the criminal must be a man
with a “strain of weakness” within himself painting the exact portrait of the criminal figure early
on in the novel. As Caroline describes her brother as being “weak as water” due to a “bad
upbringing”, Poirot then leads to a description of a man with a “weakness” deep inside him
which the right circumstances could awake leading to him being tempted into the opportunity to
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ramiriam. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.11. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
