This set of notes cover the concept of the Mens Rea, which should come after or go in conjunction with the notes on the Actus Reus. This set of notes should provide a good summary of the concept of the Mens Rea for students of A Level Law as well as Law Undergraduates who may want a more basic summ...
Mens Rea
The mens rea is the second element alongside the actus reus which must be satisfied in order for
there to be criminal liability.
It refers to the state of mind of the defendant, or their intention, as they committed the act.
There are three distinct levels used to describe the mens rea:
- Subjective Recklessness
- Oblique or Indirect Intention
- Direct Intention
Direct Intent
As alluded to by the name, direct intent is where the defendant makes a decision to bring about a
criminal consequence. This definition comes from the case of R v Mohan.
R v Mohan –
Direct intention is the decision to bring about a criminal consequence, so that it is the defendant’s
aim or purpose.
Indirect or Oblique Intent
There are several elements that need to be dealt with in order to establish whether a defendant had
indirect/oblique intent when committing a crime. Case law, such as that from R v Hancock and
Shankland.
R v Hancock and Shankland –
- Defendants wanted to stop the victim’s car.
- In order to do this, they pushed a concrete block onto the road.
- The driver was hit by the concrete block and killed as a result.
In this case, the defendants had indirect/oblique intent rather than direct intent.
This is because of the fact that the main reason for pushing the concrete block onto the road was to
stop the car, rather than to kill the driver.
Section 8 Criminal Justice Act 1967 –
- Defendant will not be regarded as intending or foreseeing a consequence just because it is a
natural or probable consequence of his actions.
- The court will decide if the defendant intended or foresaw the consequence by referring to
all the evidence and making proper inferences.
For murder cases, there is a line of case law that is used when deciding whether a defendant
intended or foresaw death.
Foresight of Consequences
This comes into play where the defendant’s aim was not the prohibited consequence and they
intended something else.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aishaabdelrahim. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
