100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Applied Law Unit 3 Assignment 1 P3, P4, M2, M3 $11.30
In winkelwagen

Essay

Applied Law Unit 3 Assignment 1 P3, P4, M2, M3

10 beoordelingen
 11 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

P3: Explain the elements of crime M2: Analyse the elements in crime P4: Explain the elements of specific non – fatal offences M3: Compare and contrast the elements of two specific non – fatal offences

Laatste update van het document: 7 jaar geleden

Voorbeeld 1 van de 5  pagina's

  • 20 mei 2017
  • 20 mei 2017
  • 5
  • 2016/2017
  • Essay
  • Onbekend
  • Onbekend

10  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: maw202 • 4 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: astonmurrell • 5 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: tamiodeyemi • 5 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: anistnk14 • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: lybahs16 • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: josephasiwaju • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: syedaklak2 • 6 jaar geleden

Bekijk meer beoordelingen  
avatar-seller
P3: Explain the elements of crime
M2: Analyse the elements in crime
P4: Explain the elements of specific non – fatal offences
M3: Compare and contrast the elements of two specific non – fatal offences


In this report, I will explain the different elements of crime and how they work when applied to
different cases. I will start by explaining the term Actus Reus. This means the physical element and
committing the act where as Mens Rea means the mentality side such as intention and recklessness.
I will also be explaining the five non-fatal offences as well as compare section 18, 20 and 47. The five
non – fatal offences that I will be exploring are; assault, battery, Actual bodily harm (ABH), Grievous
bodily harm (GBH) and GBH with intent.

Actus Reus translates to “to do an act” in Latin which means the occurrence of the criminal act or an
unlawful omission of an act. A requirement of a criminal act is that the defendant must perform the
act voluntarily, in other words they must control the act. As well as a threat is required or the use of
force and there must be a consequence of actual bodily harm, in other words some injury to the
victim. The voluntary nature of actus reus is illustrated in Hill v Baxter where the court gave
examples where a driver of a vehicle could not be said of doing the act of driving voluntary.
Involuntary acts and assaults of actus reus for example where a person hits someone due to a reflex
action. This example shows that the criminal law is concerned with fault on the part of the
defendant. There is also state of affair cases for example the Larsonneur case where the defendant
had been convicted of even though they did not act voluntarily. The defendant was ordered to leave
United Kingdom but she was deported back to United Kingdom. The defendant did not want to go
back and clearly did not act voluntarily. She was arrested as soon as she arrived in the UK.

There are omissions of actus reus and the meaning of an omission is that it cannot make a person
guilty of an offence. However, there are exceptions to the rule as in some cases there is possibility
for a failure to act to be the actus reus. In common law an omission is only sufficient for the actus
reus where there is a duty to act. There are five ways in which such a duty exists;
- A contractual duty: In Pitwood a railway crossing keeper omitted to shut the gates but a person
crossing the line was struck and killed by a train. The keeper was guilty of manslaughter.
- Relationship: A child’s father failed to feed his child that the child died from starvation this was the
case Gibbins and Proctor. The father and his mistress were guilty of murder.
- Voluntarily: In the case Stone and Dobinson, Stone’s elderly sister came to live with the
defendants but she became ill and unable to care for herself so she died. The defendants were
convicted of manslaughter through failing to care for her or summon help when she became
helpless.
- Official position: A police officer witnessed a violent attack but decided to ignore the situation by
driving away. The officer was guilty of wilfully and without reasonable excuse neglecting to perform
his duty. This was the case Dytham.
- Defendant set motion a chain of events- In the case Miller a squatter accidently started a fire but
when he realised he left the room and slept in another room. The defendant did not try to put out
the fire or summon help therefore, he was guilty of arson.

The causation is the actus reus from which the specific injury or other effect arose and is combined
with the mens rea to compromise the elements of guilt. The causation has to be proved in order to
consider whether criminal offence has taken place but it can be difficult to prove.

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper v001. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $11.30. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 65040 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Laatst bekeken door jou


$11.30  11x  verkocht
  • (10)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd