100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LML4807 Assignment 1 Semester 2 (Due 22 August 2023) $2.93   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LML4807 Assignment 1 Semester 2 (Due 22 August 2023)

 18 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

LML4807 Assignment 1 Semester 2 (Due: 22 August 2023)

Preview 1 out of 5  pages

  • August 19, 2023
  • 5
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
A+


LML4807
ASSIGNMENT 1 (SEMESTER 2)

DUE DATE: 22 August 2023




NB: This assignment must be submitted by all students who are registered for the
LML4807 module in the second semester of 2023

LML4807_ASSIGNMENT 01_02/2023


Carefully read the case below, from your prescribed reading list, and answer the following
questions:
Joint Stock v Absa Bank 2008 (4) SA 287 (SCA).



QUESTIONS:

The allocation of marks for this case discussion is as follows:
1. Briefly outline the key facts of the case (3 Marks)
2. What were the main arguments by the concerned parties (2 Marks)
3. Summarise the decision of the court (meaning the reasons for the decision of the court) (4
Marks)
4. Provide your critical comment on this decision, in particular the finding by Cachalia JA in
respect of the knowledge of the bank (your own opinion on whether the court correctly
interpreted the law) (1 Mark)

ANSWER:
Key Facts of the Case:
In this case, the appellant (Joint Stock) deposited funds into an account held with Absa Bank (the
respondent). These funds were earmarked for specific payments to subcontractors and other
parties involved in a project. The funds were held in this account for the purpose of making
payments to the designated parties once the necessary formalities were met. Absa Bank
appropriated the funds in the account to settle debts owed to it by the account holder's debtors.
Main Arguments by Concerned Parties:
• The appellant's position centred on the assertion that the funds deposited in the Absa
account were explicitly earmarked for their use. They emphasized that Absa was well
aware of this particular purpose for the funds. The appellant argued that Absa's subsequent
appropriation of these funds was unjust and in violation of the law.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudentGyde. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.93  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart