100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary A* Evaluation AO3 SCIZOPHRENIA - AQA A-Level Psychology Paper 3

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
13
Uploaded on
26-08-2023
Written in
2022/2023

A* grade evaluation points for SCHIZOPHRENIA in AQA A-Level Psychology Paper 3. Learn these short, summarised evaluation points to prepare you for any essay or evaluation question that could come up in the exam. The document is laid out in a table to make it easy to memorise and comes with a blank version so you can 'blurt' the information into the table after reviewing the content to test how much you can remember! This method of memorising AO3 points helped me achieve 81/96 (A*) in A-Level Psychology Paper 3 in 2023!

Show more Read less
Institution
Module









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
August 26, 2023
Number of pages
13
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

AQA A-Level Psychology Paper 3
SCHIZOPHRENIA
AO3 Evaluation Points

VALIDITY in -
classification
and diagnosis

Validity refers to GENDER BIAS
how accurate a LONGENECKER: males are more likely to be diagnosed than females
diagnosis of SZ COTTON: highly functioning women may not receive diagnosis, more likely to work and have relationships which can offer support, better
is to the patient interpersonal skills may bias practitioners to underdiagnose SZ
LORING + POWELL: 290 male + female psychiatrists, read 2 case studies, if patient is described as male = 56% diagnosed SZ
when female = only 20%

SYMPTOM OVERLAP - diagnosis - ELLASON
Overlap of symptoms of SZ and bipolar disorder, both have positive symptoms like delusions and negative symptoms like avolition
Classification - may just be variants of a single condition
Diagnosis - hard to distinguish SZ from bipolar disorder
ELLASON: claimed Dissociative Identity Disorder has more SZ symptoms than people diagnosed with SZ

CO-MORBIDITY - classification
Occurrence of 2 disorders simultaneously, they may not be 2 separate disorders - questions validity of classification
BUCKLEY et al:
50% with SZ have depression
47% with substance abuse
29% with PTSD
23% with OCD


RELIABILITY in + -
classification
and diagnosis

OSÓRIO et al. CHENIAUX et al.
Reported excellent reliability for diagnosis of SZ in 180 2 psychiatrists independently diagnosed 100 patients using ICD and DSM, 68
people using DSM-5 diagnosed SZ under ICD and 39 under DSM
Inter-rater reliability of +0.97 = criterion validity is low
INTER-RATER +
Test-retest of +0.92
TEST-RETEST
WHALEY found inter-rater correlation as low as +0.11

ROSENHAN’s being sane in insane places, 11 healthy ppts diagnosed with SZ
after reporting hearing ‘hollow’, ‘thud’, ‘empty’ not known auditory hallucinations

, CULTURE BIAS - COPELAND, PINTO + JONES, ESCOBAR
Copeland et al: gave description of patient to 134 US psychiatrists and 194
British psychiatrists, 69% US psychiatrists vs 2% British gave diagnosis of SZ
Pinto + Jones: British people of African-Caribbean descent are up to 9x as
CULTURE
likely to be diagnosed with SZ than white British people, though people in these
BIAS
countries aren’t (no genetic predisposition therefore)
= hearing voices is common in those cultures, seen as voice of ancestors, in
[Reliability refers to the consistency of the diagnosis over UK it isn’t
time and across cultures and psychiatrists] Escobar: white psychiatrists tend to over-interpret symptoms of black people


Biological Explanations - AO1
TIENARI - adoption study
Of 164 adoptees whose biological mothers had SZ, 6.7% also received diagnosis, compared to 2% in control group

RIPKE - polygenic
Combined previous data from genome-wide studies, compared genetic make-up of 37,000 with SZ to 113,000 controls
Found 108 genetic variations associated with increased risk of SZ
The most likely genes are ones that code for neurotransmitters, like COMT + AKT1 (BENZEL et al.)
SZ is aetiologically heterogeneous - different combos of genes are implicated

KENDLER - first-degree relatives are 18x more at risk than general population

Due to mutation - BROWN
0.7% risk in children whose fathers are <25
2% risk with fathers over 50

Genetics + -
Research support CA: equal-environment assumption for twin studies
GOTTESMAN, as genetic similarity increases, so does risk of SZ,
children with aunt/uncle - 2% chance, sibling - 9%, DZ - 17%
concordant, 2 SZ parents - 46%, MZ twin - 48%
JOSEPH, pooled data for all SZ twin studies pre-2001, found
concordance for MZs - 40.4%, DZ - 7.4%

Environmental factors - MORGAN, DIFORTI, MORKVED
Environmental factors can be biological and psychological
Birth complications increase risk - MORGAN
Smoking THC-rich cannabis in adolescence - DIFORTI
Childhood trauma - MORKVED found 67% of SZs and those with
related psychotic disorders reported at least 1 childhood trauma
$11.02
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
FranMarsz University College London
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
13
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
7
Documents
23
Last sold
1 month ago
A* Grade A-Level Notes and Quizlet Access

Hello! I\\\'m Fran and I have just completed my A-Levels, achieving A*, A*, A* in Spanish, History and Psychology. In these 3 subjects, I achieved the highest marks in my year group. I\\\'m here to share the resources that helped me achieve these grades. At GCSE, I achieved 9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,8,8. I\\\'m currently studying modern languages at University College London. Contact me if you have any queries!

4.0

3 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions