100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A Level Psychology Essay Plans/Notes - Social Influence $7.19   Add to cart

Other

A Level Psychology Essay Plans/Notes - Social Influence

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Contains 16 mark essay plans in note form for each page of the textbook, containing all necessary information meaning they are not only essay plans also but concise notes.

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • August 30, 2023
  • 5
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Psychology A Level Essay Plans/Notes – Social Influence

Describe and evaluate Asch’s research into conformity

AO1

 (1951), baseline procedure, 123 american men, line test, had to state which line was
different, 1 particpant vs confederates, conformed around 1/3 of the time
 variables - group size (increased), unanimity (dissenter decreased), task difficulty
(increased)

AO3

 limitation - artificial situation/task, knew it was a study, demand characteristics,
trivial task, do not generalise to real world settings
 limitation - limited application, american men, women may be different ie more
conformist, US is individualist, conformity higher in collectivist states, lacks
universitality
 strength - research support, Lucas et al (2006), maths problems, conformed more
often to harder tasks, task difficulty variable is correct

Describe and evaluate informational social influence and normative social
influnece as explanations of conformity

AO1

 ISI - cognitive process about who has better information, we want to be right, more
likely in new situations/ambiguity/crisis situations
 NSI - normal behaviour in a group, emotional, temporary change in
opinions/behaviour, more likely with strangers/when concerned with social
approval/stressful situations

AO3

 strength - research support for NSI, Asch interviewed participants, said they felt self
concious, when writing answers rather than speaking conformity fell to 12.5%, desire
to not be rejected
 strength - research support for ISI, Lucas, higher conformity with harder questions,
did not want to be wrong
 limitation - individual differences in NSI, some more concerned with being liked,
nAffilliators more likely to conform, cannot be explained by one theory

Discuss research into conformity to social roles

AO1

,  Zimabardo SPE (1973), randomly assigned to prisoners/guards, encouraged to
conform, uniforms, instructions for behaviour
 guards took roles seriously, prisoners rebelled, highlighted social roles by
establishing punishments, increased aggression, ended after 6 days

AO3

 strength - control, eg emotionally stable participants chosen and randomly assigned,
means behaviour was due to social roles, increased internal validity
 limitation - lack of realism, play acting vs conforming, based on stereotypes or from
movies, findings say little about actual prison social roles
 limitation - exaggerates the power of roles, only 1/3 guards were brutal, others tried
to help and support prisoners, able to resist situational pressures, overstated
findings and minimised influence of dispositional factors

Describe and evaluate Milgram’s research into obediance

AO1

 1963, 40 american men, supposed study on memory, ordered to give (fake) electric
shocks on fake participant doing memory test
 all participants = 300V, 65% continued to 450V ie fully obediant, found germans are
not different as americans were willing to obey

AO3

 strength - research support, reproduced in french tv show, 80% were fully obediant,
supports original findings
 limitation - low internal validity, Perry (2013), participant tapes saying only 1/2
participants believed shocks were real, demand characterstics
 limitation - alternative interpretation of findings, social identity theory, participants
obeyed when in line with experiment, ‘identifying with science’, more valid
explanation

Describe and evaluate 2 or more situational variables that have been shown by
Milgram to affect obediance to authority

AO1

 proximity - same room vs phone, decreased proximity allows to psychologically
distance from consequences of actions (increased proximity means increased
obediance)
 location - yale vs run down office, prestigous environemnt gives legitimacy and
authority (increased obediance)
 uniform - lab coat vs everyday clothes, symbols of authority (increased obediance
with uniform)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller beatrixzoe. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.19. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62491 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.19
  • (0)
  Add to cart