,INHOUDSOPGAVE
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 1: RECHTSMACHT 14/9/22..........................................................................................8
LITERATUUR...........................................................................................................................................................8
Paragraaf 1.1: Regeling in nationale wetgeving..............................................................................................8
Paragraaf 1.2: Uiteenlopende betekenissen rechtsmacht...............................................................................8
Paragraaf 1.4. Soevereiniteit...........................................................................................................................9
Paragraaf 1.5. Rechtsmachtconflicten.............................................................................................................9
Paragraaf 1.6. Verbod van terugwerkende kracht........................................................................................10
Paragraaf 2 Komptetenz-Kompetenz: de bevoegdheid rechtsmacht vast te stellen.....................................10
Paragraaf 2.1. Drie benaderingen..................................................................................................................10
Paragraaf 2.2. Een vierde benadering...........................................................................................................11
Paragraaf 2.3. Beoordeling door de rechter..................................................................................................11
Paragraaf 3: Nationaal belang en internationale solidariteit als fundamenten voor rechtsmacht..............12
Paragraaf 9.1. Het beginsel van de afgeleide rechtsmacht...........................................................................13
Paragraaf 9.2 Afgeleide rechtsmacht in Nederland.......................................................................................13
JURISPRUDENTIE...................................................................................................................................................14
HR 18 september 2001, ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AB1471, m.nt. N.J. Schrijver en J.M. Reijntjes (Decembermoorden
Suriname).......................................................................................................................................................14
HR 21 oktober 2008, ECLI:NL:HR:2008:BD6568, m.nt. N. Keijzer..................................................................14
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 2: VERVOLG RECHTSMACHT 21/9/22.........................................................................15
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................15
Paragraaf 4.1. Het territorialiteitsbeginsel....................................................................................................15
Paragraaf 4.2. Locus delicti............................................................................................................................15
Paragraaf 4.3. Het territorialiteitsbeginsel in nederland...............................................................................16
Paragraaf 5.1. Het beschermingsbeginsel.....................................................................................................17
Paragraaf 5.2. Het beschermingsbeginsel in nederland................................................................................17
Paragraaf 6.1. Het passieve nationaliteitsbeginsel.......................................................................................17
Paragraaf 6.2. Als zelfstandige grondslag in het Nederlandse strafrecht.....................................................18
Paragraaf 7.1. Het actieve nationaliteitsbeginsel (kenmerken)....................................................................18
Paragraaf 7.2. Actieve nationaliteitsbeginsel in nederland...........................................................................19
Paragraaf 7.3. Dubbele strafbaarheid............................................................................................................19
Paragraaf 8 Ambtenaren en militairen..........................................................................................................19
Paragraaf 10.1. Het universaliteitsbeginsel...................................................................................................19
Paragraaf 10.2. Universele rechtsmacht in nederland..................................................................................20
Paragraaf 11: het beginsel van de bescherming der bovenstatelijke gemeenschappen...............................21
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 3: RECHTSMACHT EN IMMUNITEITEN 28/9/22...........................................................22
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................22
Paragraaf 12.1 Immuniteiten: uitzondering op rechtsmacht, Algemene regeling........................................22
Paragraaf 12.2. subjecten en objecten van immuniteiten,............................................................................23
12.3. Persoonlijke en functionele immuniteit.................................................................................................27
Paragraaf 13: Strafvordering buiten het rechtsgebied van een rechtbank...................................................27
R. van Elst, ‘Nieuwe Nederlandse regels voor een beperkte immuniteit inzake internationale misdrijven’,
DD 2013/41....................................................................................................................................................28
JURISPRUDENTIE...................................................................................................................................................32
IGH 14 februari 2002, Democratische Republiek Congo tegen België (Yerodia), Ars Aequi 51 (2002), p. 829-
839;.................................................................................................................................................................32
HR 9 september 1975, NJ 1976/69 m.nt. G.E. Mulder;..................................................................................33
HR 2 maart 1993, NJ 1993/677;.....................................................................................................................33
HR 13 november 2007, ECLI:NL:HR:2007:BA9173, NJ 2008/147 m.nt. N. Keijzer (Euratom);.....................33
Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 26 september 2014, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2014:7398, NJ2014/465.............................34
HR 4 april 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:574;..........................................................................................................34
, HR 4 april 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:575;..........................................................................................................34
HR 4 april 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:577, NJ 2018/108 m.nt. E. van Sliedregt (Tamil Tijgers arresten)...........34
HR 29 april 2008, ECLI:HR:NL:2008:BC3766, NJ 2008/482 m.nt. A.H. Klip;...................................................34
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 4 EN 5: IMMUNITEITEN EN UITLEVERING 4/10/22......................................................35
LITERATUUR........................................................................................................................................................35
Paragraaf 2.1. Soevereiniteitsbeginsel..........................................................................................................36
Paragraaf 2.2. Vertrouwensbeginsel.............................................................................................................37
Paragraaf 2.3. Specialiteitsbeginsel...............................................................................................................37
Paragraaf 2.4. Wederkerigheidsbeginsel.......................................................................................................38
Paragraaf 3: de uitleveringsprocedure..........................................................................................................38
Paragraaf 3.2. Uitleveringsverzoek................................................................................................................38
Paragraaf 3.3. Behandeling van het uitleveringsonderzoek..........................................................................38
Paragraaf 3.4. Kort geding.............................................................................................................................39
Paragraaf 3.5. Het EHRM...............................................................................................................................39
Paragraaf 3.7. Verkorte procedure................................................................................................................41
Paragraaf 3.8 Recht op rechtsbijstand...........................................................................................................41
Paragraaf 3.9. Inbeslagneming......................................................................................................................41
Paragraaf 4.2. Verdragsgrondslag.................................................................................................................42
Paragraaf 4.3. Genoegzaamheid van de stukken..........................................................................................42
Paragraaf 4.4. Dubbele strafbaarheid: uitleveringsrechter...........................................................................43
Paragraaf 4.8. Evidente onschuld: uitleveringsrechter..................................................................................43
Paragraaf 4.10 Rechtsmacht..........................................................................................................................44
Paragraaf 4.11: Ne Bis In Idem......................................................................................................................44
Paragraaf 4.12 Beëindigde strafvervolging in Nederland.............................................................................45
Paragraaf 4.13 Lopende strafvervolging in Nederland..................................................................................45
Paragraaf 4.14. Verjaring...............................................................................................................................45
Paragraaf 4.15: voltooide of dreigende flagrante schending van mensenrechten.......................................45
Paragraaf 4.16: doodstraf..............................................................................................................................45
Paragraaf 4.17 Verstekvonnissen..................................................................................................................46
Paragraaf 4.18 Discriminatoire vervolging: de Minister van Justitie en Veiligheid.......................................46
Paragraaf 4.19: Bijzonder hardheid...............................................................................................................46
Paragraaf 5: slotbeschouwing.......................................................................................................................46
JURISPRUDENTIE...................................................................................................................................................47
HR 4 februari 2003, ECLI:NL:HR:2003:AF0451...............................................................................................47
HR 27 mei 2003, NJ 2003/573........................................................................................................................47
HR 14 april 2006, ECLI:NL:HR:2006:AU9724, NJ 2006/446 m.nt. N. Keijzer..................................................47
HR 7 juli 2004, ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AP1534, NJ 2004/595.................................................................................48
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 6: MENSENRECHTENSCHENDINGEN 19/10/22............................................................49
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................49
Paragraaf 4.15: voltooide of dreigende flagrante schending van mensenrechten.......................................49
JURISPRUDENTIE...................................................................................................................................................51
HR 21 maart 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:463, NJ 2017/276 m.nt. N. Rozemond..............................................51
HR 4 september 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:1426, NJ 2018/972.......................................................................51
HR 30 oktober 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:2019, NJ 2019/228 m.nt. N. Rozemond..........................................52
Soering t. V.K., EHRM 7 juli 1989, 14038/88, NJ 1990/158 m.nt. E.A. Alkema............................................53
Othman (Abu Qatada) t. V.K., 8139/09, EHRM 17 januari 2012, NJ 2013/360 m.nt. N. Keijzer..................53
HR 20 mei 2003, ECLI:NL:HR:2003:AF3308, NJ 2004/41 m.nt. Y. Buruma...................................................54
HR 26 juni 2007, ECLI:NL:HR:2007:BA0875 (‘precisering’ van NJ 2004/41).................................................55
HR 7 mei 2004, ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AF6988, NJ 2007/276 m.nt. A.H. Klip;.....................................................55
HR 15 september 2006, ECLI:NL:HR:2006:AV7387, NJ 2007, 277 m.nt. A.H. Klip........................................55
HR 17 april 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BW2489, NJ 2014/263 m.nt. A.H. Klip (Sabir K);.................................55
HR 11 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:1680, NJ 2016/14 m.nt. A.H. Klip. (K).....................................................55
, HvJ EU 5 april 2016, C-404/15 en C-659/15 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:198, SWE 2016/7-8 m.nt. V.H. Glerum
(Aranyosi en Căldăraru);................................................................................................................................56
HvJ EU 25 juli 2018, C-216/18 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2018:586, AB 2019/74 m.nt. P. Bovend’Eert (LM)*............56
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 7 EN 8:OVERDRACHT EN OVERNAME TENUITVOERLEGGING STRAFVONNIS 26/10/22 58
LITERATUUR.........................................................................................................................................................58
Paragraaf 1: Inleiding.....................................................................................................................................58
Paragraaf 2: De traditionele overdracht en overname: inleidende beschouwingen.....................................58
Paragraaf 2.1: begripsbepalingen..................................................................................................................58
Paragraaf 2.2: bronnen..................................................................................................................................59
Paragraaf 2.3: Beginselen..............................................................................................................................61
Paragraaf 2.4: Doeleinden.............................................................................................................................61
Paragraaf 3: Overname door Nederland.......................................................................................................62
Paragraaf 3.1: Inleiding: diverse procedures en autoriteiten........................................................................62
Paragraaf 3.2: Exequaturprocedure..............................................................................................................63
Paragraaf 3.3: Buitengerechtelijke procedures.............................................................................................66
Paragraaf 3.4: Procedure inzake overname verstekvonnissen......................................................................67
Paragraaf 3.5: Voorlopige maatregelen........................................................................................................68
Paragraaf 3.6: Rechtsbijstand........................................................................................................................69
Paragraaf 3.7: Rechtsmiddelen......................................................................................................................70
Paragraaf 3.8: Vergoeding van kosten en schade.........................................................................................71
Paragraaf 3.9: Feitelijke tenuitvoerlegging...................................................................................................72
Paragraaf 3.10: Voorwaarden voor overname (weigeringsgronden)...........................................................73
Paragraaf 4 Overdracht door Nederland.......................................................................................................75
Paragraaf 4.1 Procedure voor overdracht: inleiding......................................................................................76
Paragraaf 4.2 Vormen van overdracht..........................................................................................................76
Paragraaf 4.3 Rechtsbijstand.........................................................................................................................77
Paragraaf 4.4 Rechtsmiddelen.......................................................................................................................77
Paragraaf 4.5 Feitelijke tenuitvoerlegging....................................................................................................77
Paragraaf 4.6 Voorwaarden voor overdracht (weigeringsgronden).............................................................78
Paragraaf 5 Wederzijdse erkenning: algemene inleiding..............................................................................79
Paragraaf 6 Erkenning en tenuitvoerlegging in Nederland...........................................................................82
Paragraaf 6.1 Vrijheidsbenemende sancties..................................................................................................82
Paragraaf 6.2 Voorwaardelijke sancties en taakstraffen..............................................................................87
Paragraaf 6.3 Geldelijke sancties...................................................................................................................89
Paragraaf 6.4 Beslissingen tot confiscatie.....................................................................................................91
Paragraaf 6.5 Beslissingen tot conservatoire beslaglegging (bevriezing).....................................................92
Paragraaf 7 Overdracht door Nederland. Erkenning en tenuitvoerlegging van Nederlandse beslissingen in
een andere EU lidstaat...................................................................................................................................95
Paragraaf 7.1 Vrijheidsbenemende sancties..................................................................................................95
Paragraaf 7.2 Voorwaardelijke sancties en taakstraffen..............................................................................97
Paragraaf 7.3 Geldelijke sancties...................................................................................................................97
Paragraaf 7.4 Beslissingen tot confiscatie.....................................................................................................98
Paragraaf 7.5 Beslissingen tot bevriezing......................................................................................................99
R. van Elst, ‘Wederzijdse erkenning in Nederland van buitenlandse strafvonnissen’, Sancties 2015/25......99
JURISPRUDENTIE.................................................................................................................................................105
HR 26 juni 1990, NJ 1991/188 m.nt. A.H.J. Swart........................................................................................105
EHRM 26 juni 1992, 12747/87, NJ 1995/258 m.nt. G. Knigge (Drozd & Janousek/Frankrijk en Spanje)....105
HR 13 oktober 1998, NJ 1999/177 m.nt. T.M. Schalken..............................................................................105
HvJ EU 10 augustus 2017, C-271/17 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2017:629 (Zdziaszek)................................................105
HvJ EU 10 augustus 2017, C-270/17 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2017:628 (Tupikas)...................................................105
HR 20 november 2007, ECLI:NL:HR:2007:BA7927, NJ 2008/59 m.nt. A.H. Klip...........................................106
HOOR/WERKCOLLEGE 9 EN 10: VERSTEK EN UNIESTRAFRECHT 9/11/22......................................................107
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller esmeevhhof. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.