Explain and analyse 3 arguments for/against the UK as a multi-party state. (9)
P – representation.
Ex – of diverse political viewpoints, needs of citizens addressed, > dominant political party ones.
Ev – Green environment focus, UKIP against EU, Brexit Party reform single-issue.
An – instability, political gridlock, difficult to form stable coalitions. Cameron-Clegg coalition.
P – greater choice,
Ex – 2 party, forced between lesser of 2 evils. > party that closely align with their values/beliefs.
Ev – Green party, forced Tories and Lb to adopt environmental concerns, eaten into Lab vote.
An – lack of a clear mandate, no clear majority of the vote, Brexit Cons not supported by DUP.
P – increased accountability.
Ex – power is divided amongst multiple parties, difficult to ignore concerns and needs of people.
Ev – SNP, most successful, forced Lab and Tory to listen devolved powers and independence ref.
An – increased polarisation, aims of SNP conflict w/ parliamentary sovereignty, blocked 2 nd ref.
Explain and analyse 3 arguments for the influence of ordinary members. (9)
P – promotes grassroots activism.
Ex – voice/role policy/strategy promote civic engagement, more inclusive & representative politics.
Ev – Cons. Adopting same-sex marriage in 2013, driven by pressure from ordinary party members.
An – factionalism/hostility, different forms of activisms, SNP’s infighting over independence.
P – enhances democratic legitimacy.
Ex – demonstrate responsive to needs/desires electorate, great trust & confidence.
Ev – People’s vote campaign pro-EU, LD, reenergised party to see successes in 2019.
An – far-right extremism, ordinary members UKIP drive anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
P – brings new perspectives/ideas.
Ex –attuned to concerns/priorities, experiences inform policy/strategy, effective solutions.
Ev – electing Corbyn 2015, LW views & anti-establishment stance resonated, move from centrist.
An – antisemitism 2018, driven by ordinary party members, comments on social media.
Explain and analyse 3 criticisms of leadership election. (9)
P – lack of accountability.
Ex – elected by party members > public, less accountable, pursue narrow policies/strategies.
Ev – Cons leadership election 2022, voters felt annoyance it was out of their hands.
An – inclusivity/diversity, Lib dem leadership election 2017, open, transparent w/ diversity.
, Political Parties
P – limited participation.
Ex – small proportion, views of a small/unrepresentative group determine direction of party.
Ev – UKIP leadership election 2017, dominated by far-right voices, eventual winner forced to resign.
An – engaging party members/supporters, SNP leadership election 2014, high participation.
P – factionalism/division.
Ex – parties divided along ideological/factional lines; leadership elections become battlegrounds.
Ev – Lab leadership election 2016, criticised for being divisive, Corbyn leadership infighting/division.
An – selects leaders who are well-suited, Lab leadership election demonstrated the potential to
engage large numbers of party members & supporters.
Explain and analyse 3 criticisms of the policy making process. (9)
P – lack of transparency and public involvement.
Ex – behind closed doors, limited input, policies that are not in the best interests of the public.
Ev – Grenfell Tower Inquiry 2017, criticised for lack of transparency.
An – are examples of consultation and engagement, citizen’s assembly 2019 on climate change.
P – limited accountability.
Ex –ministers/civil servants, significant power to shape policy, not subject to same scrutiny.
Ev – Brexit negotiations, concerned raised over the lack of transparency in the negotiations.
An – flexible and adaptable, COVID-19 response, highly dynamic, introduced lockdowns/tier systems.
P – influence of interest groups.
Ex – problematic, significant financial/political power, shape to benefit themselves > public.
Ev – 2012, gov criticised for meeting with tobacco lobbyists to discuss plain packaging laws.
An – evidence-based decision making, education policy in UK, introduced phonics-based reading in
schools based on research.
Explain and analyse 3 functions of a political party. (9)
P – representation.
Ex – aim to provide a voice for different groups in society, advocate for policies reflecting them.
Ev – Lab party reflect the interests of workers & Tus, recently minority communities.
An – fail to represent diverse interests, Cons party criticised, predominantly white, male & UC.
P – electoral competition.
Ex – provide voters with a choice between diff policy platforms/leadership style
Ev – 2019. GE, significant comp between 2 main parties over issue of Brexit.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller manalahmed. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.