Unit 36.1 - Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780-1928
Institution
PEARSON (PEARSON)
Book
Access to History: Protest, Agitation and Parliamentary Reform in Britain 1780-1928 for Edexcel
revision notes for chapters 1,3,4,5 and 6, paper 3. Extremely useful notes, that are well organised. No additional notes for these chapters are needed when revising for your exams!
HISTORY A LEVEL CHANGES TO THE FRANCHISE NOTES (A*)
Britain - Protest and agitation 1780-1928 Revision Guide
All for this textbook (5)
Written for
A/AS Level
PEARSON (PEARSON)
History 2015
Unit 36.1 - Protest, agitation and parliamentary reform in Britain, c1780-1928
All documents for this subject (4)
7
reviews
By: gmateiu9 • 2 year ago
By: harrymurtagh92 • 3 year ago
By: steikunaitem • 3 year ago
By: omarasuman8 • 5 year ago
By: annabellehart4 • 6 year ago
By: nattalie6598 • 6 year ago
By: xceri-annwilliamsx • 7 year ago
Seller
Follow
salmaa
Reviews received
Content preview
Chapter 1
How effective were pressures for change to the franchise in the years 1780 to 1928?
Essay question: To what extent was reform of the franchise in the years 1780-1928 influenced
by extra parliamentary pressure
International affairs had a significant impact on the extension of the franchise, in the
sense that it sparked political interest in England, which in turn, accelerated the pace of
reform. For instance, the outbreak of the French revolution in 1789, aroused many to
make connections between their economic struggles and political corruption, such
as the working class who began to organize political groups for the first time and
demanded reform of the franchise. International affairs also accelerated the pace of
reform. The French revolution's influence is limited in the sense that it didn't have much
impact beyond it triggering support for reform in mainly northern towns and cities. There
was a significant decline in the influence and activities of reform groups during the
1790’s, because the state possessed the effective tools to combat threats from these
groups (Seditious Meetings Act 1795), which shows the wars’ subsidizing effect on
reform. Additionally, in the long term, it showed that its impact created the
circumstances for more reform, while contradictorily restraining reform as well. The
Crimean War had demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the military and civilian
leadership, which had caused a large number of deaths in the armed forces. Groups and
organizations such as the ‘National Reform Union’ believed that franchise reform would
lead to a more efficient and effective government. It had a similar effect to the French
war; it encouraged more radical movements to demand further franchise reform. This
was a slow-paced factor, because although the Crimean war occurred in the years 1854
to 1856, pressure for reform returned in 1865 afterwards, and it was mostly due to the
deteriorated economy. Thus, the Crimean war was not a major factor for the extension
of the franchise. Furthermore, the First World War had a more profound effect on the
extension of the franchise 1918 and 1928, which leads to the next discussion.
The First World War was significant to the extent that it helped lead to universal suffrage.
The war would undermine the principle of property qualifications, while at the same time
bringing about a dramatic change in the status of women. By 1916, all political parties
agreed that it was indefensible that young men could be sent to fight and to die in the
war, but did not have the right to vote. This injustice was remedied with the Reform Act
1918, which finally ended the system of property qualifications and established universal
male suffrage. The Act also took the first tentative steps in the direction of female
suffrage by enfranchising women over the age of 30. It seemingly had a more extensive
impact than both the Crimean or French war. Moreover, many emphasized the role of
the suffragettes in putting pressure on the government to introduce universal suffrage,
especially from Feminist societies such as the ‘National Union of Societies for Equal
Citizenship’ and ‘National Union of Women’s suffrage Societies’. The Representation of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller salmaa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
