100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary PHI1025F Critical Thinking Exam Study Notes. All content included $8.51
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. PHI1025F Critical Thinking

Summary

Summary PHI1025F Critical Thinking Exam Study Notes. All content included
 1 purchase
  • Course
  • PHI1025F Critical Thinking
  • Institution
  • University Of Cape Town (UCT)

Summary of all content covered in phi1025 (critical thinking) The notes are made from my lecture notes and the info in the provided textbook

Preview 8 out of 27  pages

Document information

  • June 23, 2017
  • 27
  • 2015/2016
  • Summary

Subjects

  • critical thinking
  • philosohy
  • phi1025f

Written for

  • University of Cape Town (UCT)
  • PHI1025F Critical Thinking
All documents for this subject (7)

Seller

avatar-seller
byrondevin

Reviews received

Content preview

Glossary
Argument
 Claim with reasons/evidence supporting it
 The relationship between a claim and the reason/evidence
 Claim= conclusion
 Reason/evidence= premise

Deductive argument
 Premises successfully prove the conclusion

Inductive Argument
 Premises give reasons to believe the conclusion is likely to be true
 Therefore never valid even though it can be very strong

Statement
 Doesn’t defend/convince/motivate
 Unsupported claim not supported by premises
 Is true, false, or unknown

Rhetorical question
 Often a statement
 Disguised as a question

Premises
 Reasons backing up an argument

Assumption of bi-valence
 Every statement is either true or false, weather we know it or not

Command
 An instruction

Fallacy
 Bad/problematic way of reasoning

Explanation
 Not an argument
 Doesn’t try to convince the reader a claim/conclusion is true
 Casual story

Normative Claim
 Explaining what ought to happen
 Without a normative claim, a normative conclusion is impossible

Normative conclusion
 Explains what should happen
 Often appeals to morals

,Relativism
 Accepting all arguments/opinions as true
 A load of shit
o Philosophers don’t believe

Valid
 Conclusion is always true as long as the premises are true

Sound
 Must be valid
 Must have true premises
 Conclusion always true
o If the premises of a valid argument are true the conclusion must be
true

Sufficient condition
 X will result in y
 Y can still happen with D or F

Necessary condition
 Without X, Y cannot happen
 X does not guarantee Y, but is needed

Eliminate Syllogism
 Either X or Y
 Not X
 Therefor Y

Or
 Inclusive
 Either P or Q
o Can be P
o Can be Q
o Can be both
Categorical syllogism
 Valid
o All/some X are Y
o All Y are Z
o Therefore, all/some X are Z
o Either use all for both, or some for both
 Invalid
o All X are Y
o All Y are Z
o Therefore, some X are Z

Formal Fallacy
 See it’s a fallacy by looking at the form
 Has an invalid argument form

,Argument
A conclusion with premise(es) justifying it


Deduction and Induction
Deductive argument
 Premises successfully prove the conclusion

Inductive Argument
 Premises give reasons to believe the conclusion is likely to be true
 Therefore never valid even though it can be very strong



Finding an argument
 Find conclusion
 Find premises
 Use indicators
o Words/phrases typically before/after a premise/conclusion

,Obstacles to critical thinking
Bias
 Personal Bias
o Matches your beliefs
 Liverpool are better than united
o Holds beliefs which will benefit you
 People in my profession should be paid more
o Overestimate your own abilities
 Cultural Bias
o Favour views that conform to our beliefs

Language and knowledge/ Rhetoric devices
 Random Sentences
o No logical order to the argument
o Can’t assess it because there is no argument to assess
 Vagueness
o More information needed to critically assess what has been said
o Not specific enough
 “new and improved”
 Empty Rhetoric
o Don’t really say anything, just say what people want to hear
o Information missing that would enable us to assess
 “yeas we can”
 Ambiguity
o Can be interpreted in more than one way
 Nothing is brighter than a supernova
A candle is brighter than nothing
Therefore a candle is brighter than a supernova
 Emotive language
o Appealing to the readers emotion
o Not reasoning using the most neutral language



Relativism/Subjectivism
 Accepting all arguments/opinions as true
 A load of shit
o Philosophers don’t believe

,Fallacies
Fallacy of Evidence
 Can be true but doesn’t completely support/justify the argument
 Premises have some bearing on the conclusion, but not the way the
arguer suggests


Fallacy of relevance
 Can be true but doesn’t support/justify the argument
 Premises don’t support the conclusion because they aren’t relevant


Ad hominem Fallacy
 Attack the person saying the argument instead of the argument
o Usually negative
 “don’t believe what Tracy says about global warming. She is
a dope smoking Hippy”
o Can also be positive
 There must be life on mars. Mr. Jones said so and he is a
college professor

Attacking the Motive
 Inverse of hominem fallacy
 If somebody has a motive to support X, therefore anything he says
supporting X is false
 Just because you have a motive to believe something doesn’t mean you
are wrong
 Once again not looking at the actual argument
 Motive should raise suspicion but doesn’t on its own disprove an
argument. Cause someone to suspend judgment until evidence supporting

Look Who’s Talking
 Premises 1. John says you should stop smoking because it is bad
 Premises 2. John Smokes. Not practicing what he preaches
 Conclusion. John’s claims about smoking are false
 Just because you are a hypocrite doesn’t mean you are wrong

,Two wrongs make a right fallacy
 Structure
o Premise: X is wrong
o Premise: But Y is wrong too or even worse
o Conclusion: Therefore X is really okay
 X can still be wrong as well even if to a lesser extent
 Being a lesser evil doesn’t make it a virtue
 Is it a fallacy if your wrong is preventing a worse wrong?

Scare Tactics
 Threat unrelated to the outcome
o Voting for the ANC is voting for the end of South Africa


Appeal to pity
 Some aspect of your argument appealing to emotions
 A fallacy if you only appealing to pity

Bandwagon Fallacy
 Jumping on the bandwagon
 It is a good argument if the people have had relevant experience
o All eaten at a restaurant and say its good

Straw Man fallacy
 Misrepresents a claim to make it look silly
 Makes a caricature of the argument
 Exaggerate one side completely
 Pick up on one part of an argument and running with it


Red herring Fallacy
 Irrelevant claim
 Aimed to distract from conclusion
 Also used in detective novels
o False clues
 We should ban alcohol consumption
o Very bad for children
o Irrelevant because of the age limit

,Zeno’s Paradox
Achilles and the tortoise
 Read through

The arrow
 Read through

, Deductive Arguments
Deductive argument
 Premises successfully prove the conclusion
 Either valid or sound
o Valid
 Conclusion is always true as long as the premises are true
o Sound
 Must be valid
 Must have true premises
 Conclusion always true
 If the premises of a valid argument are true the
conclusion must be true because it is valid


Valid Deductive Argument Forms
Modus Ponens
 If P, then Q
 P
 Therefore Q

Modus Tollens
 If P, then Q
 Not Q
 Therefore not P

Syllogisms
 3 lines
 First 2 lines = premises
 Third line = conclusion

Categorical syllogism
 At least one premise states something about a category
 Form
o All x are y
o Some y are z
o Therefore, some x are z

Eliminative Syllogism
 Argument of elimination
 Form
o Either x or y
o Not x
o Therefore y
 Not the other way around
o OR IS INCLUSIVE

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller byrondevin. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.51. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$8.51  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added