100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary AQA Sociology - Marxist Perspective on Education (10 marker) $8.01   Add to cart

Summary

Summary AQA Sociology - Marxist Perspective on Education (10 marker)

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A* Sociology Student, sat exams in 2022 and received a grade of over 95%. These are answers for AQA (but would work for all exam boards). Past paper question on the topic of perspectives in education specifically that of the marxist perspective on education, answered to 10/10, 100% (high A*, ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • September 7, 2023
  • 1
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Sociology 10 Marker – (Education) – Marxist Perspective

Applying Material from Item A, analyse two ways in which the education system might serve the
needs of capitalism (10)

One way in which Marxists may argue the education system might serve the needs of capitalism is
through the production of ‘new generation(s) of workers. Marxist sociologists such as Bowles and
Gintis (1976) assert that the education system maintains these capitalist values through teaching
obedient attitudes – through a close correspondence between the school and the workplace, the
‘correspondence principle’. This argument promulgates the belief that within school, students are
taught the norms and values that will make their future exploitation by employers easier, an
example of this is motivation via external rewards, as within school students may undertake
repetitive lessons for high grades, whereas in the workplace they work repetitive jobs and are
rewarded by wages. With the workers funnelled into the necessary required worker for the
bourgeoisie, the education system reproduces an exploited ‘new generation’ of workers perpetually
ensuring the continuance of capitalism is not hindered. However, in contemporary society, neo-
Marxists, such as Giroux (1984) reject this premise that the children are moulded by the capitalist
system and suggests that the existence of anti-school subcultures (truancy and exclusion) show that
the correspondence principle may be failing in practice. This is further supported by Willis (1977)
report ‘Learning to Labour’ in which he studied working-class school children in their final year of
school and found that these deterministic theories did not hold up, undermining the view of Bowles
and Gintis and supporting that of Giroux. However he believed that the outcome was much the
same and this rejection led to academic insufficiency in which students are unable to socially
progress as they do not have the facilities to leading to low-paid work enabling the poverty trap.

Another method in which Marxist sociologists argue the education system serves the needs of
capitalism is socially controlling the proletariat to not ‘overthrow this unequal system’. Marxist
sociologist Louis Althusser (1971) argues that the educational system argues as an Ideological State
Apparatus (ISA), which brainwashes the population, denying them to see their own exploitation
(known as ‘false class consciousness’ due to the misguiding view of their own position within
society). The ISA is taught through functions such as the hidden curriculum, which is taught covertly
within education and Marxists take the view it assimilates proletariat students into accepting and
legitimising their place within society, and those who ‘stand out’ or ‘fail to comply’ are treated with
social control – being given sanctions (i.e. detention). Thereby, this function ensures that this
‘unequal system’ is not overthrown as the proletariat accept their place within society as inevitable,
ascribed and invariant – perpetuating capitalism. This is supported through an overwhelming wealth
of evidence, proving that the middle class do better in education (wealthiest 7% of families can send
their children to private school in turn giving them increased life chances such as increased
university prospects), because the working classes are more likely to suffer from material and
cultural deprivation – and legislation such as the 1988 Education Act benefited them, as argued by
Ball.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jasonmclark. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.01. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.01
  • (0)
  Add to cart