WJEC Unit 3 Criminology AC 2.1 Explain the requirements of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for prosecuting suspects
82 views 0 purchase
Course
Crime Scene to Courtroom
Institution
WJEC
Book
WJEC Level 3 Applied Certificate and Diploma Criminology
WJEC Unit 3 Criminology AC 2.1 Explain the requirements of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for prosecuting suspects
Received an A for this exam. For personal use only, do not copy this work
WJEC Level 3 Applied Diploma in Criminology Unit 2 AC1.1 Compare Criminal behaviour and Deviance
Ac 1.4 Evaluate the roles of personnel involved in criminal investigations
All for this textbook (143)
Written for
A/AS Level
WJEC
Criminology
Crime Scene to Courtroom
All documents for this subject (372)
Seller
Follow
studyinqpeachy
Reviews received
Content preview
AC 2.1 Explain the requirements of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for
prosecuting suspects
In 1986, the CPS was created by the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The main aim of the
CPS is to determine whether a case is viable to go to court by using multiple tests. Their
duty is to ensure that a case has enough evidence to go to court, and that a case will secure
a verdict successfully. The CPS has many different responsibilities such as: advising police
on certain evidence that may be needed, completing certain tests, determining the charges
deemed appropriate for cases, being a 24 hour service, etc.
Prior to the CPS, all cases that went to court were under the control of the police, who would
investigate and prosecute crimes, which was unreliable as this could have led to biases, a
heavy workload, and more resources being wasted. Furthermore, institutional biases
amongst the police meant that some cases may have been more likely to go to court, and
this may have been due to racism, ageism, etc. Institutional biases may have also been
based on the type of crime being committed, as not every police officer may have the right
training to tackle certain crimes and may have biases, such as male officers having more
biases towards domestic abuse cases.
The CPS does certain tests to determine whether a case will go to court or not. The full code
test ensures that there is fairness and consistency within the prosecution process. The CPS
used two tests to determine whether a case is valid to go to court: the evidential test and the
public interest test. The evidential test determines whether or not the evidence is reliable and
admissible. It ensures that the evidence has solid proof of a crime, and that it could secure a
conviction. Furthermore, the CPS will need to make sure that not only that physical evidence
is reliable and admissible, but testimonial and eye witness evidence is reliable and
admissible. If the CPS does not conduct the evidential tests, then this could cause mistakes
in the courtroom, and the case could collapse due to not having the correct or reliable
evidence. If the case fails the evidential test, then the case may not go to court, however the
CPS may choose to conduct the public interest test as a second measure. The public
interest test involves the CPS considering whether or not the case would be of the interest of
the public. This involves asking questions such as: how serious the crime was, the impact on
the local community, the seriousness of the crime, etc. The CPS will also consider the impact
of the victims, as well as the offenders. If all of these tests have been passed successfully,
then the case can go to court. However, if the case does not pass either the evidential test or
the public interest test, then the threshold test will be conducted. This test can only be
considered if a suspect is a bail risk and that if not all of the evidence is available at that
time. Some questions asked during the threshold test include: is there a reasonable
suspicion the person has committed the offence, are there reasonable grounds to continue
the investigation to gather more evidence, etc.
There are some limitations however to the CPS, which include the fact that there are a
number of cases that end up not going to court, which leads to some people not receiving
the justice they deserve. Furthermore, some cases may lead to wrongful convictions, and it
may be due to the CPS’s fault (e.g not doing the tests properly) which may cause innocent
people to be wrongly convicted and for miscarriages of justice to take place.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller studyinqpeachy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
