100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary SQE2 - Black Letter Law Equity $17.40   Add to cart

Summary

Summary SQE2 - Black Letter Law Equity

 26 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Used these notes to achieve 70% on SQE2 first time.

Preview 3 out of 28  pages

  • September 10, 2023
  • 28
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
THREE CERTAINTIES AND
DECLARATIONS
Will Formalities

s.9 Wills Act 1837 must be in writing, signed and witnessed by two parties to be valid.
s.15 Wills Act 1837 states that witnesses nor their spouses may receive from the will if they have
witnessed. This does not affect the validity of the will. MAKE SURE YOU LOOK AT WHO
WITNESSES WHAT.

Wills and trust may only take effect after death, until then anything expressed in them is not in
existence. Wills are automatically revoked in the event of the following:

- the marriage of the testator
- Destruction of the current will with the intention of revocation
- drawing up a new will over the same property
- revocation of individual gifts by codicil

The intestacy rules will apply if there is no will or to any residue if there is no residue gift or said
gift fails.

Gift

For a valid gift to be presented the three certainties must be met intention, subject and object.

Intention

Firstly, the donor must have intent and said intent must come from a donor who has the necessary
mental capacity. The level of the mental capacity rises with the value and size of the gift (Re
Beaney).

Subject

The subject must be sufficiently certain i.e. there is a tangible benefit that can be enforced. Terms
like ‘the bulk of’ are not sufficiently certain (Palmer v Simmonds). Additionally, tangible items need
to be separate from similar items or they will be deemed too uncertain (Re London Wine Company).
This does not apply to intangible items of the same class i.e. shares as these are indistinguishable
(Hunter v Moss). Furthermore, if there is a workable formula for calculating the amount in question
then the subject will be sufficiently certain. In Re Golay ‘a reasonable income’ was valid. This
however is unlikely to apply to capital sums.

Object

The intended person/s of the trust must be certain (Morice v Bishops of Durham). In said case Sir
William Grant stated - ‘every trust must have a definite object’.
1

,Trust With Self As Trustee

The three certainties must be present for a trust to be validly formed. Additionally, the beneficiary
principle, rules against perpetuity and the formalities must all be satisfied.

Intention

It must be clear that the settler intended to create the trust. There must be imperative wording that
illustrate an intention to create a legally binding obligation. Intention is established by words or
conduct but no express use of the word trust is needed (Paul v Constance; Re Kayford). Precatory
words which merely form a moral obligation will not be sufficient for intent (Re Adams and
Kensington Vestry).

Subject

See above

Object

See above

Beneficiary Principle

The trust must have ascertainable human beneficiaries who can enforce the terms of the trust
(Morice v Bishop of Durham).

Rules Against Perpetuity

These rules are designed to keep money freely flowing through-out the economy. For a
discretionary trust there is a rule against remoteness of vesting - pre 1/4/2010 vesting must have
occurred within 80 years (Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964) and post 1/4/2010 vesting must
have occurred within 125 years (Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009).

For a non-charitable purpose trust (Honorary and Denley Trusts) the rules against alienability mean
the trust must be vested within 21 years or allow the trustees to spend all the trust capital on the
purpose.

Formalities for Declaration

Declarations of trust over land must be evidenced in writing and signed by the transferor (s.53(1)(b)
LPA 1925).

Trust With Other As Trustee

The three certainties must be present for a trust to be validly formed. Additionally, the beneficiary
principle, rules against perpetuity and the formalities must all be satisfied.


2

, Intention

It must be clear that the settler intended to create the trust. There must be imperative wording that
illustrate an intention to create a legally binding obligation. Intention is established by words or
conduct but no express use of the word trust is needed (Paul v Constance; Re Kayford). Precatory
words which merely form a moral obligation will not be sufficient for intent (Re Adams and
Kensington Vestry).

Should be noted that intention is not normally and issue in this case as the settler is normally dead
and thus the intent is the will.

Subject

See above

Object

See above

Beneficiary Principle

The trust must have ascertainable human beneficiaries who can enforce the terms of the trust
(Morice v Bishop of Durham).

Rules Against Perpetuity

These rules are designed to keep money freely flowing through-out the economy. For a
discretionary trust there is a rile against remoteness of vesting - pre 1/4/2010 vesting must have
occurred within 80 years (Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964) and post 1/4/2010 vesting must
have occurred within 125 years (Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009).

For a non-charitable purpose trust (Honorary and Denley) the rules against alienability mean the
trust must be vested within 21 years or allow the trustees to spend all the trust capital on the
purpose.

Formalities for Declaration

Declarations of trust over land must be evidenced in writing and signed by the transferor (s.53(1)(b)
LPA 1925).

Failure For Uncertainties

If the trust fails on one of the three certainties then the following occurs:

- Failure of intention but certain subject matter = a gift to the trustee (Re Adams and Kensington
Vestry).
- Failure of subject matter but certain intention = test is void (Palmer v Simmonds)
- Uncertain objects = a resulting trust back to the settlor (Vandervell v IRC)
3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SQELawNotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.40. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79835 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.40
  • (0)
  Add to cart