Summary
Summary Misrepresentation and Frustration
- Course
- Institution
- Book
2i Contract Law notes
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Consideration and Promissory Estoppel; Intention to Create Legal Relations
-
Offer and Acceptance
-
Remedies
Seller
Follow
christan1911
Reviews received
Content preview
Contract Law Supervision 6: Frustrationand Misrepresentation
Textbook Reading
McKendrick TCM Chpt 17: Misrepresentation
[These are outline notes only, focussing on discussion of cases – re-read TB for overview]
Requirements: Establish a misrepresentation has been made to claimant; a
misrepresentation is an unambiguous false statement of fact, made to the claimant, which
induced him to enter into a contract remedy of rescission, subject to bars to rescission
(third party rights). Whole contract set aside but alternative remedy of damages unser
S2 Misrepresentation Act 1967.
I. INTRODUCTION
Only applies where pre-contractual statement has not been incorporated into the
contract as a term (or else this would be breach of contract). S1(a) Misrepresentation Act
1967: a party who has entered into a contract after misrepresentation has been made
may rescind contract for misrep even where the misrep is subsequently incorporated
into the contract as a term, provided that he is entitled to rescind contract without
alleging fraud.
II. WHAT IS MISREPRESENTATION?
Unambiguous false statement;
Statement must usually be one of fact (not law / opinion – but these were OK in
Esso Petroleum Ltd v Maradon where there was some special skill of person giving
opinion, and Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney respectively). Statement of
intention not good enough: Edgington v Maurice
Statement must be addressed to party misled – can be via a third party where
intention of first party is that info gets to second party – Commercial Bank of
Sydney v RH Brown and Co.
Misrep must be ‘material’ – Bisset v Wilkinson [1927].
Inducement: not a but-for cause, but just a cause: Edgington v Maurice (1885)
Statements of Opinions
Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177, PC
Facts: purchase of homestead in NZ; seller said land could carry more sheep than it could
actually carry – land was derelict before sale, so carrying capacity was necessarily an
opinion or an estimation.
Lord Merrivale: Statement of opinion must arise from underlying facts – honest opinion
– but the buyer also inspected the farm and there is a requirement of due diligence – no
misrep – not actionable.
1|Page
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller christan1911. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77858 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now