100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
grounds of judicial review- irrationality and proportionality $9.77   Add to cart

Class notes

grounds of judicial review- irrationality and proportionality

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

a useful and well detailed analysis of the topic

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • September 19, 2023
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Unsure
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Lecture 19- Grounds of Judicial Review- Irrationality and proportionality
Irrationality

in this session

- a quick reminder about convention rights
- explain what is meant by ‘proportionality’
- outline some cases that have dealt with this ground of review

Proportionality and qualified rights

article 10 (freedom of expression)

(1) includes ‘freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impact information and ideas without
interference from public authorities
(2) the right can be limited if restrictions and prescribed by law, and necessary to achieve a
specified purpose
specified purpose for admissible limitations are;
- protection of national security, territorial integrity or public safety
- prevention of crime or public disorder
- protection of health and morals
- protection or reputation or rights of others
- prevention of disclosure of confidential information
- protection of judicial independence

proportionality and convention rights

qualified rights

- limitations on the right must be
1. prescribed by law
2. necessary
3. for a specified purpose

ECtHR approach to proportionality

Brind v UK [18714/91]

- restriction was prescribed by law (s29(3) broadcasting act 1981)
- prevention of terrorism is a specified purpose in article 10(2)
- ‘necessary’- was the restriction proportionate (the minimum interference required to
achieve the aim)

proportionality

in this session

- consider application of proportionality in the UK
- outline some key points about remedies

Human rights act 1998 (in force in 2000)

R v secretary of state for the home department ex p Daly [2001] UKHL 26

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sansomeevie. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.77. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60434 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.77
  • (0)
  Add to cart