The Politics of Difference: “how power and political institutions categorize people into
groups and how this generates inequality”
Difference
- Protected in the private space
- Not present in the public sphere – public sphere is meant to be neutral
Public sphere
- Neutrality isn’t defined, it depends on the perspective and context
Take aways
- Not all differences are political, we’re interested in how and why some
differences become and remain political
- Defining what is “Normal” and what is “Different” is political
- Political scientists study differences between interests and identities
- Political theorists have often seen differences as best protected by respecting
individual freedom in the private sphere
- Critical theorists question the possibility of a neutral public sphere
- Describing difference – through statistics or otherwise – is political
Readings 2
Young
- The interest-based model of democracy presumes people cannot make claims on
others about justice or the public good
- Model of deliberative democracy
o Conceives democracy as a process that creates a public, citizens coming
together to talk about collective problems, goals, ideals, and actions.
o Mostly appears in the decision-making structures of voluntary
associations outside the state.
But also found in processes of state policy formation in
legislature or public hearings
o Participants come to a problem with an open mind, they are not bound by
prior norms or requirements
o Deliberation is both culturally neutral and universal
Lecture 2: Difference in Public
,The Public sphere is
- A communicative realm
- To discuss and debate the common interest and government
- Where the force of the better argument wins (coercion is absent)
- Where participants leave their status and identities behind
Public sphere as a realm of communication
- Places where people discuss and talk about politics
- Does not have to happen live, it can be online
Discussing the common interest
- May not be a subject of public concern
- TH Marshall: The ever going debate on who is a part of society and get to
contribute in it – who is able to have a voice?
o The first question the public faces
What is part of the common and what is the government?
- Key principle: the force of the better argument wins
o Potential for decisions to be made based on reason
A veil of ignorance
- A hypothetical state, in which decisions about social justice and the allocation of
resources would be made fairly, as if by a person who must decide on society’s
rules and economic structures without knowing what position they will occupy
in that society
Positionality
- All theory is for someone and some purpose
- Influenced by (in research):
o Method
o Gender
o Race/ethnicity
o Nationality
o Language
Bennett & Livingston
- Authoritarian stated perpetrate forms of information and use them as ways of
state control
- Three arguments on disinformation
o Confirmation bias: We begin our research with a set of beliefs. We
search for facts that confirm our beliefs
o Social media – no neutral arbiter
o State interference. The activity of foreign governments to look for
arguments
- Institutions: they prevent the proliferation of disinformation
- Loss of faith in political actors
Young
- “Deliberative democracy”
- Public = neutral sphere
, o Issues with that assumption
We are seeking arguments that can give us particular outcomes
- 3 ways to open up the public sphere
o Greeting
o Rhetoric
o Story telling
Recognizing positionality – Advantages
- Instead of encouraging pure objectivity, it encourages participants to reflect on
their positionality
- Instead of privileging the good of the (re)public, admits that the good of certain
groups may require unique solutions that go against the public interest
Take aways
- The public sphere is a realm of political debate where the better argument wins
- Political scientists debate how political truths are, but rarely whether truth is
possible
- Disinformation is the product of individual bias, social media, state interference
AND the erosion of institutions
- Communicative democracy places difference at the center of democratic debate
Week 2
Readings 3
Lecture 3: Religion
- Religion in Politics of Difference – Islam vs. west
- “Religion is on the rise”
o Driving force for politics
- More religious groups nowadays
- Religion as organized violence is a rising force
o But: religion has never gone away – foundation for modern politics
- Sovereignty: Hobbes
o Role of religion in society and politics
Religious tolerance as the foundation to the state system
- 30 years war – defining religion in your territory = sovereignty
- Diversity in religious models of tolerance
Secular politics
- Religion is thought of as a private concern
- Laicité = religion is kept outside
- Secular thought:
o Separation between church and state
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kiaracampagne. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.08. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.