The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Authors: Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French.
Source: The Journal of Finance, Vol. XLVII, No. 2 (June., 1992), pp. 427-465
Research question(s):
1. Is there still a valid relation between average return and β? (Does CAPM still apply)
2. Are other (risk) factors related to average returns?
Underlying intuition
The most famous asset pricing model, CAPM, hypothesizes average stock returns are positively
related to β. Fama and French (FF) reinvestigate this hypothesis with more recent data, and an
altered methodology. Multiple claims refute the original findings, and such this paper aims to
falsify these contradictions.
An additional research question follows the research of other authors regarding factors related
to expected returns. This paper aims to add to previous findings by testing average returns with
a CAPM model enhanced with additional factors (three-factor model). The factors are based on
the following company characteristics: Book-to-Market (B/M), Size (M), A/M, A/B and EPS.
Research Methodology & Data
Monthly returns for all from major US exchanges (NYSE, AMEX & NASDAQ) from 1962 – 1990
are used. Financials are excluded, as their leverage is too high relative to non-financial stocks.
Two main methods are used to find information on factors explaining average return: Double-
sorting based on company characteristics, and a cross-sectional regression ran over average
returns using past company characteristics as factors (Fama and MacBeth (FM) regression). FM
regressions used portfolio β’s instead of individual stock β’s as they tend to be more accurate.
An additional issue here is that the beta and the size of a firm have a strong relation. Double-
sorting is used to solve this (using the first method).
Double-sorting in steps:
1. Sort stocks into ten size deciles
2. Take prior data (preceding 24 months - 60 months) to size sorting date to estimate β
per stock, we call these the pre-ranking β
3. Within each size decile, sort stocks into ten β deciles. We now have 100 portfolios
4. Calculate the return of the portfolios over the next year
5. Redo steps 1 to 4 for each year (re-sort the portfolio on a newly estimated pre-
ranking β) in the dataset.
6. For each size-β portfolio, estimate a portfolio (post-ranking) β over the full sample
period.
The second method (FM regression) is used to investigate the relation of a combination of
factors with stock returns. The regression is equal to:
BE A
𝑅"# = 𝛾'# + 𝛾)# 𝛽+",#-) + 𝛾.# 𝑙𝑛(ME)",#-) + 𝛾5# 𝑙𝑛(
)",#-) + 𝛾7# 𝑙𝑛( )",#-)
ME ME
A E E +
+ 𝛾9# 𝑙𝑛( )",#-) + 𝛾:# ( dummy)",#-) + 𝛾@# + 𝜂"#
BE P P ",#-)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller claudiughiuzan. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.19. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.