Summary
Goede en volledige samenvatting MEDIA ETHIEK
- Course
- Institution
13/20 behaald in eerste zit veel extra notities
[Show more]
Seller
Followjulievandermueren
Reviews received
Content preview
2022-2023MEDIA ETHIEK
Julie Van der Mueren
,Inhoudsopgave
1 LES 1: INTRODUCTIE TOT ETHIEK EN MEDIA-ETHIEK ........................................................................................ 4
1.1 WAT IS MEDIA-ETHIEK? ...................................................................................................................................4
1.2 WAT IS FILOSOFIE? .........................................................................................................................................4
1.3 FILOSOFISCHE METHODE..................................................................................................................................4
1.4 EXPERIMENTELE FILOSOFIE ...............................................................................................................................5
1.5 WAT IS ETHIEK? .............................................................................................................................................5
1.6 WAAROM ZIJN WE GEVOELIG VOOR MORALITEIT? ................................................................................................6
2 LES 2: MORELE THEORIEËN ............................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 UTILITARISME (OOK GEKEND ALS CONSEQUENTIALISME) ........................................................................................7
2.1.1 Basisprincipe en historiek .....................................................................................................................7
2.1.2 Utilitarisme in de 20ste eeuw ................................................................................................................8
2.1.3 Voordelen .............................................................................................................................................9
2.1.4 Nadelen.................................................................................................................................................9
2.1.5 Supererogatorisch ................................................................................................................................9
2.2 DEONTOLOGISCHE ETHIEK (OOK GEKEND ALS PLICHTENLEER)............................................................................... 10
2.2.1 Ethisch voldoende om een goede uitkomst te verzekeren? .............................................................. 10
2.2.2 Deontologische ethiek ....................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.3 Deontologische ethiek: Kant ............................................................................................................. 11
2.2.4 Christine Korsgaard (1952) ............................................................................................................... 12
2.2.5 Kritiek op postkoloniale filosofie, Charles Mills (1951 – 2021) ......................................................... 13
2.2.6 Deontologische ethiek en ecologische ethiek ................................................................................... 13
2.3 ETHIEK VAN DE RECHTVAARDIGHEID (OOK GEKEND ALS DISTRIBUTIEVE ETHIEK) ....................................................... 13
2.3.1 Theorie van de rechtvaardigheid ...................................................................................................... 14
2.3.2 Alternatief van “niet-ideale theorie” ................................................................................................. 15
2.3.3 Kritiek te onpersoonlijk – Martha Nussbaum (1947) ........................................................................ 16
2.4 DEUGDETHIEK (OOK GEKEND ALS DEUGDENLEER) .............................................................................................. 16
2.4.1 De hergeboorte van deugdethiek...................................................................................................... 17
2.4.2 Deugdenleer ...................................................................................................................................... 17
2.4.3 Voordelen .......................................................................................................................................... 18
2.4.4 Nadelen.............................................................................................................................................. 18
2.4.5 Deugdethiek in andere culturen ........................................................................................................ 18
2.5 ZORGETHIEK ............................................................................................................................................... 18
2.5.1 Zorgethiek: stadia van Lawrence Kohlberg ....................................................................................... 18
2.5.2 Zorgethiek: Carol Gilligan 1984......................................................................................................... 19
3 LES 3: TOEGEPASTE ETHIEK ............................................................................................................................. 21
3.1 INLEIDING: TOEGEPASTE ETHIEK (MOREEL RELATIVISME EN MORELE PRINCIPES) ...................................................... 21
3.1.1 Situering toegepaste ethiek .............................................................................................................. 21
3.1.2 Moreel relativisme............................................................................................................................. 21
3.1.3 Toegepaste ethiek: principlisme ........................................................................................................ 22
3.2 6 MORELE PRINCIPES IN MEDIA ETHIEK ............................................................................................................ 23
3.2.1 Transparantie en vertrouwen............................................................................................................ 23
3.2.2 Rechtvaardigheid............................................................................................................................... 24
3.2.3 Niet schaden ...................................................................................................................................... 24
3.2.4 Autonomie ......................................................................................................................................... 24
3.2.5 Privacy ............................................................................................................................................... 25
3.2.6 Publiek belang / sociaal engagement / gemeenschap ..................................................................... 25
3.3 REFLECTIEF EVENWICHT (STERK EN ZWAKKE ARGUMENTATIE) .............................................................................. 26
3.3.1 Het reflectieve evenwicht .................................................................................................................. 26
3.3.2 Sterke rechtvaardiging ...................................................................................................................... 26
3.3.3 Zwakke rechtvaardiging .................................................................................................................... 27
3.3.4 Caveats! ............................................................................................................................................. 29
3.3.5 Voorbeelden ...................................................................................................................................... 29
1
, 3.4 JOURNALISTIEKE DEONTOLOGIE ...................................................................................................................... 30
3.4.1 Journalistieke accountability ............................................................................................................. 32
4 LES 4: RECLAME................................................................................................................................................ 33
4.1 INLEIDING .................................................................................................................................................. 33
4.1.1 Reclame en transparantie ................................................................................................................. 33
4.1.2 Reclame en morele theorieën ........................................................................................................... 33
4.2 TWEE VISIES OP ETHIEK EN RECLAME .............................................................................................................. 34
4.2.1 Het economisch argument (artikel M. Werner) ................................................................................ 34
4.2.2 Wanneer / waarom reclame tolereren (artikel S. Neuteleers) ......................................................... 34
4.3 WETTELIJK KADER RECLAME .......................................................................................................................... 36
4.4 RECLAME EN SOCIALE MEDIA: ETHIEK EN INFLUENCERS ....................................................................................... 36
4.5 HET GOEDE ALS VERKOOPARGUMENT (ETHISCH CONSUMEREN?) ......................................................................... 37
5 LES 5: (REALITY) TV ........................................................................................................................................... 38
5.1 BEÏNVLOEDING EN COMMUNICATIETECHNOLOGIE ............................................................................................. 38
5.1.1 Impact van communicatietechnologie .............................................................................................. 38
5.1.2 Communicatietechnologie ................................................................................................................ 38
5.1.3 Beïnvloeding en televisie ................................................................................................................... 38
5.2 REALITY-TV ................................................................................................................................................ 39
5.2.1 Definitie en ethische ambiguïteit ...................................................................................................... 39
5.2.2 Pijnpunten.......................................................................................................................................... 40
5.3 (MIS)REPRESENTATIE ................................................................................................................................... 41
5.3.1 Impact van documentaires en fictie op acceptatie (zie laatste les) ................................................. 41
6 LES 6: TECHNOLOGIE ....................................................................................................................................... 42
6.1 INLEIDING .................................................................................................................................................. 42
6.2 MENS EN TECHNOLOGIE ............................................................................................................................... 42
6.2.1 Mens en of vs. Technologie ............................................................................................................... 42
6.2.2 Voorbeelden tecnologie als morele bemiddeling .............................................................................. 43
6.2.3 Technologie als morele actor: intentionaliteit .................................................................................. 44
6.2.4 Technologie als morele actor: vrijheid .............................................................................................. 44
6.3 TECHNOLOGISCH DETERMINISME EN TECHNOLOGISCHE IMPERATIEF ..................................................................... 45
6.3.1 Technologie en vrijheid: technologische dwang? ............................................................................. 45
6.3.2 Technologie is niet unidirectioneel .................................................................................................... 45
6.4 CASE: ARTIFICIËLE INTELLIGENTIE ................................................................................................................... 46
6.4.1 AI4People: afwegen van goede en slichte aspecten AI ..................................................................... 46
6.4.2 AI4People: toegepast- ethische principes ......................................................................................... 46
6.4.3 Negatief: AI en algoritmische bias .................................................................................................... 48
6.4.4 Ethiek van de artificiële intelligentie: ‘ethics by design’ ................................................................... 48
7 LES 7: ETHIEK VAN DE SOCIALE MEDIA............................................................................................................ 49
8 LES 8: ETHIEK VAN DE SOCIALE MEDIA............................................................................................................ 49
8.1 BESPREKING “THE SOCIAL DILEMMA”............................................................................................................. 49
8.2 INLEIDING: SOCIAL NETWORKING AND ETHICS .................................................................................................. 49
8.2.1 Social Media en (on)deugdethiek ...................................................................................................... 49
8.3 PRIVACY EN BIG DATA .................................................................................................................................. 49
8.3.1 Big Data: Commercialisatie ............................................................................................................... 50
8.3.2 Ethische principes voor ‘privacy by design’ ....................................................................................... 51
8.4 ONLINE VRIENDSCHAP? ................................................................................................................................ 51
8.4.1 Vriendschap en sociale media: technologisch pessimisme............................................................... 51
8.4.2 Vriendschap en sociale media: constitutief voor hedendaagse sociale relaties .............................. 52
8.5 SOCIALE MEDIA EN DEMOCRATIE .................................................................................................................... 53
8.5.1 Bedreigingen...................................................................................................................................... 53
8.5.2 Informatieluchtbellen ........................................................................................................................ 53
8.5.3 Sociale media en democratie: mogelijkheden .................................................................................. 53
2
, 8.5.4 Een alternatief? ................................................................................................................................. 54
9 LES 9: DISCUSSIEGROEP FAKE NEWS ............................................................................................................... 55
10 LES 10: ETHIEK VAN VIDEOGAMES .................................................................................................................. 55
10.1 WELKE ETHISCHE DILEMMA’S ROEPEN VIDEOGAMES OP? (GAMEPERSPECTIEF) ....................................................... 55
10.2 HOE KUNNEN WE MORELE THEORIEËN TOEPASSEN OP VIDEOGAMES ..................................................................... 55
10.2.1 Magische cirkel ............................................................................................................................. 55
10.2.2 Morele theorieën in videogames.................................................................................................. 56
10.2.3 Utilitarisme en games .................................................................................................................. 56
10.2.4 Deontologie en games .................................................................................................................. 57
10.2.5 Deugdethiek en games ................................................................................................................. 57
10.2.6 The gamers’ dilemma (Morgan Luck) .......................................................................................... 58
10.2.7 Zorgethiek in videogames (Murphy en Zagal) ............................................................................. 58
10.3 WAT KUNNEN VIDOGAMES ONS LEREN OVER MORALITEIT? (PERSPECTIEF VAN DE SPELER) ........................................ 58
10.3.1 We become what we behold ........................................................................................................ 58
10.3.2 Moraliteit en ethiek in video games ............................................................................................. 58
10.4 WELKE MORELE DILEMMA’S ROEPT HET ONDERWERP EN MAKEN VAN GAMES OP? (PERSPECTIEF VAN DE DESIGNER) ..... 59
10.4.1 Designprincipe ‘immersion’ vs verslavingsrisico .......................................................................... 59
10.4.2 Representatie en gameplay: sanity meters.................................................................................. 59
10.4.3 Misleiding van spelers: permadeath in Hellblade: Senua’s sacrifice ........................................... 59
10.4.4 Take-away message college ......................................................................................................... 59
11 LES 11: BIO-ETHIEK EN BEELDVORMING ......................................................................................................... 60
11.1 MEDIA-ETHIEK EN BIO-ETHIEK ....................................................................................................................... 60
11.2 TRANSPARANTIE: SITUERING VAN MEZELF IN DEZE CASUS .................................................................................... 60
11.3 TRADITIONELE BEELDVORMING AUTISME EN KLASSIEKE BIO-ETHIEK....................................................................... 60
11.3.1 Autisme vanuit de 20ste eeuw ....................................................................................................... 61
11.3.2 De ‘klassieke’ bio-ethische vragen rond autisme ......................................................................... 61
11.3.3 Bio-etiek en autisme in de 21ste eeuw .......................................................................................... 61
11.3.4 Blijvend spanningsveld ................................................................................................................. 61
11.4 DISABILITY STUDIES & CRIP NEURODIVERSITEIT ................................................................................................. 61
11.4.1 De blik van binnenuit .................................................................................................................... 62
11.4.2 In de traditie van ‘disability studies’ ............................................................................................. 62
11.4.3 Neurodiversiteit ............................................................................................................................ 62
11.4.4 Validisme en mensenrechten ....................................................................................................... 62
11.4.5 Zoemsessie + brainstorm .............................................................................................................. 62
11.5 (ZELF-) REPRESENTATIE EN MEDIA-ETHIEK ........................................................................................................ 63
11.5.1 Representaties in de media beïnvloeden de bio-ethiek ............................................................... 63
11.5.2 Beeldvorming en handicap ........................................................................................................... 63
11.5.3 Neurodiversiteit: ‘niets over ons, zonder ons’ (NOOZO) .............................................................. 63
11.6 DYNAMIEK BIO- EN MEDIA ETHIEK .................................................................................................................. 63
11.6.1 Autisme wordt een dynamisch gegeven ...................................................................................... 63
11.6.2 Impact op wetenschapscommunicatie ........................................................................................ 64
11.6.3 Bio-ethiek en communicatiewetenschappen ............................................................................... 64
3
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller julievandermueren. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now