DEV ECONOMIES:
Howell, 2006 or Besson, 2009: planned rationale, not market rationale; political elites dedicated to
economic growth/national stability; productivist welfarism (less focus on social goals - Holliday,
2000); strong state intervention, export orientation; politically repressive (freedom and rights) and
weak civil society.
Castells, 1992: Principle of legitimacy = ability to promote and sustain economic growth and
development
- National project to construct national identity too (nation building)
Secondary Circuit:
Lefebvre, 2003’s theory — primary circuit stops expanding, flows into ‘property’ (secondary circuit
of real estate), secondary circuit becomes principal source, ‘supplants… and becomes ‘essential’
—> Planetary urbanisation (Merrifield, 2013), intense commodification of space under speculation
(Goldman, 2011) that extracts rent
Speculation = neoliberal alibi for creative destruction (Weber, 2002)
Investment in built env = creation of whole physical landscape for production, consumption,
accumulation
East Asia: simultaneous thrust of both circuits (urbanisation and industrialisation reinforce one
another)
- Creation of SEZ, can overcome spatial fixes for primary circuit (market access), excess money
from primary goes into secondary
- China: Shin, 2014: high speed rail networks, airports, metro construction and commercial real
state projects to support industrial production
- Uneven dev helps capital exploit surplus labour = low costs (Pun and Chan, 2012)
- State supports by providing land, infra and labour (housing and services in peri-urban/rural
areas)
- Ordos Kangbashi (Sorace and Hurst, 2015): rampant speculation + phantom city built on
fiscal excess of primary circuit
- New Beichuan (Sorace and Hurst, 2015): after construction and speculative gains, investment
into new industrial cluster but not successful: low wages, bad conditions, bad market
advantages
Fainstein, 2001: Property development becomes an economic growth strategy
Shin, 2010: vertical accumulation achieved by acquisition of property-related revenues, strong dev
states and speculative home-ownership aspirations
- Property revenues allow city development and redevelopment (cycle)
- State-biz nexus, profit-oriented and entrepreneurialism —> investments
- Homeowners want to build assets (for profit), similar to developers’ interests
- Tang, 2008: desire to accumulate property leads to idea that redev is societal progress for
middle class
- Culture of property prevents denunciation of redev and displacements (Ley and Teo, 2013)
Vicious cycle of capital investment and reI + compressed cycle of property dev and redev —>
vertical accumulation
Jang-sup Shin, 2007: main urban accumulation strategy of East Asian states = investment in infra
and tech to improve quality of built env
Urban revolution from above — rural pop become urbanites because rural land converted for urban
use (Lin et al., 2015)
Sorace and Hurst, 2015
- Nominal change and ‘upgrade’ of administrative status, without improving material conditions
(qualitative)
- Town to city, county to municipality… (Ma, 2005)
Page 1 of 14
, - Quickens urbanisation and modernisation processes throughout the country — Bulag, 2002:
magic of the term ‘city’
- Can construct urban facade (without basic infra and economic functions) Harvey, 2003
- Zhu, 2011: large-scale construction neglects QoL and needs of residents
- Aesthetic spectacle (Ren, 2012), to make a city is to show a city, merely to show political
achievements and for GDP (Yuan, 2008)
- Build replicas of famous cities
New city construction is politically motivated to achieve ideological aspirations as a show of power/
wealth and political legitimacy
- Ideological commitment: urban growth as royal road to modernity and to showcase political
performance (Shin, 2014)
Phantom urbanisation = city facade without inhabitants nor function (form divorced from practices
and uses) (Zhu, 2011)
- Urbanisation of land > urbanisation of people (1.71x faster) (Harvey, 2013)
Cartier and Tomba, 2012: For China, process of aesthetic formation is more important than
economic, demographic or env repercussion
E.g. New Beichuan (double empty shell: fake facade with rural population)
- Rural dwellers had hard time adjusting to urban life (Xie, 2011)
- Centre of city lacks personality, resident and commercial district geographically separated
- Starkitecture, fibre optics
Urbanisation driven by local state to address political aspirations and legitimise their positions as
vanguards of new Chinese urbanism (urbanisation of local state — Hsing, 2010)
- No signs of stopping: local state apparatus grows along with urban expansion (Hsing, 2010)
- Dependence on land revenue, constant ABD of homes in high-value locations (residents offered
low compensation) (Lin, 2009)
Top-down planning and forced migration (Wenchuan earthquake: citizens forcefully relocated to An
County). Double facade: rural villagers in city with form but lack function and use.
According to the logic and dynamics of accumulation (Lin and Yi, 2011)
- Administrative border-drawing to expropriate of land and investment in expanding urban infra —
> profits — Kangbashi: invest receipts from primary sector into secondary circuit by building a
new city and infrastructure
- Make rural villagers become urban consumers —> Growth (Harvey, 2008)
Urbanisation of land and infrastructure > urbanisation of people (1.7x faster)
Ghost cities seen as a temporary problem
If we build people will come (state beliefs) (Li, 2009)
Ghost cities will become tomorrow’s thriving metropolitan areas
Percival and Waley, 2012 on Cambodia:
- Facilitative role through attracting private-sector investment (Shatkin, 2011), promotion of RUM
and decentralisation, real estate is one of four national economic priorities (Sen, 2008)
- Legal: planning laws to encourage large projects, deregulation of property markets (70% of
foreign ownership of property allowed), allow labour migration of foreign talent
- Economic incentives: open to capital from foreign banks, import tax exemptions
- Good foreign relations, political stability
Privately built satellite cities (mainly for middle class)
- Adhering to international interpretation of how global urbanism should look and function
(Shatkin, 2011)
Page 2 of 14
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller annettewong. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.80. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.