100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Evaluate the view that Congress better protects rights than the Supreme Court Edexcel A Level essay plan $7.16   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Government And Politics
  6.  
  7. USA

Other

Evaluate the view that Congress better protects rights than the Supreme Court Edexcel A Level essay plan
 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • USA
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

An A* Edexcel A Level Politics essay plan on whether Congress or the Supreme Court protects constitutional rights better. Contains 3 arguments with 3 corresponding counter-arguments

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • October 17, 2023
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • essay plan
  • a level
  • edexcel
  • aqa
  • politics
  • government and politics
  • congress
  • supreme court
  • rights protection

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Government and Politics
  • USA
All documents for this subject (27)

Seller

avatar-seller
oliverdawson

Content preview

Congress and SC rights protection




Amendments – Congress

 The ones to create these entrenched rights
o 8th Amendment
o 1st Amendment
o 2nd Amendment

SC – ones to enforce these

 Texas v Johnson – banning desecration of flag is unconstitutional
 Citizens United v FEC
 DC v Heller – 2nd Amendment
 US v Lopez



Court cases protecting minorities - SC

 Grutter v Bollinger – Michigan Law School’s admissions programme constitutional due to
‘individualised approach’
 Uni of California v Bakke – ruled out racial quotas, but left door open to it being considered
 Bostock v Clayton County – Civil Rights Act protects sexual orientation

Legislation – Congress

 Civil Rights Act 1964 (race, colour, religion)
 Voting Rights Act
 PPACA



Oversight of the executive – Congress

 Senate confirmations
o Harriet Miers
o Vincent Viola
 Committees
o Hillary Clinton – Benghazi
 Impeachment
o Nixon, Trump X2



Oversight of the Executive – Supreme Court

 Unconstitutional rulings of presidency
o Hamdan v Rumsfeld – limited used of GW Bush’s military commissions abroad
o Rejected electoral fraud cases by Trump
o Nixon – executive privilege didn’t apply

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller oliverdawson. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.16
  • (0)
  Add to cart