100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Group model building - facilitating team learning using system dynamics $4.30   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Group model building - facilitating team learning using system dynamics

8 reviews
 525 views  27 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

A short summary of the highlights of the Vennix book. The summary refers at the end of every chapter to the summaries in the book of Vennix which are stated at the end of every chapter. Most of the points mentioned in those summaries are mentioned in my summary. Some prior knowledge of system dynam...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • Yes
  • October 27, 2017
  • 14
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary

8  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: keyko2000 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: harrisvaneijk • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: bartspaan1 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: wouterdehoon • 5 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: moghadam_manesh • 6 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: amaurymellaerts • 6 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: kycosadper • 6 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
Group model building – facilitating team learning using system
dynamics by Vennix
Group decision support systems = GDSS
Group communications systems = GCS
Computer supported cooperative work = CSCW
Soft systems methodology = SSM
Strategic options development and analysis = SODA
Strategic assumption surfacing and testing = SAST

Messy problems: a typical characteristic of this type of problem is that different people hold
widely dissimilar views of the situation and as a result they define problems
differently

Underlying assumptions for GMB
- People’s mental models are limited by human information processing capabilities. SD can be
helpful to elicit and integrate mental models into a more holistic view of the problem and to
explore the dynamics of this holistic view
- People have strong tendency to think in terms of causal processes. Every proposed policy to
alleviate a problem contains one or more hidden causal assumptions about the effects of policy
interventions
o It is rare for people to see more than one cause of a problem
o People have difficulties in identifying interconnections and thinking in causal nets
 The primary goal is not to build the model of the system, but rather to get a group engaged in
building a system dynamics model of a problem in order to see to what extent this process might
be helpful to increase problem understanding and to devise course of action to which team
members will feel committed
o Creating some kind of consensus (unanimous agreement about a decision) – not to be
confused with compromise!
o Effectiveness (E) of a decision is not only determined by its quality (Q) but also by its
acceptance (A) by the people who have to implement it (E=QxA)

Important characteristic of GMB is that fact is separated from value  the primary focus is descriptive
and diagnostic: the way team members think a system works is separated form the question how
they would like a system to work!

In short:
1. Create climate in which team learning can take place in order to enhance understanding of
the problem
2. Foster consensus
3. The intervention should help to create acceptance of the ensuing decision and commitment
with the decision

Chapter 1 – Individual and organizational problem construction
One of the most pervasive characteristics of messy problems is that people hold entirely different
views on (1) whether there is a problem, and if they agree there is, (2) what the problem is.
 In that sense messy problems are quite intangible and as a result various authors have suggested
that there are no objective problems, only situation defined as problems by people

Differences in previous information leads people to interpret the same information in markedly
different ways.

1

, Intersubjective knowledge: knowledge on which we agree rather than objective
knowledge

If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences. Self-fulfilling prophecy will make
me act a certain way. Self-fulfilling prophecy refers to a situation in which an expectation leads to
behaviours, which in turn produces the situation the way I defined it.
 Self-fulfilling prophecy is a ubiquitous phenomenon of social life
 People tend to look for information which confirms their viewpoint rather than to look for
evidence which might refute it

In short: people build ‘mental models’ of their environment and in turn base their behaviour in
these mental models, thereby creating situations which are subsequently interpreted
as reality

Self-denying prophecy: people act in such ways as to refute the original definition of the
situation

Reality: distinguish between ‘true’ reality (objective world out there) and social reality (reality
created in the minds of people through active selection an perception. Real world =
social reality! (trail exam)

The most important goals in structuring messy problems is the creation of a shared reality and
problem definition among the group of problem owners.

Learning experience
Learned helplessness: lack of feeling of control might prevent learning in the future in similar
situations; when you know from past experience that acting in a certain
situation has no effect you won’t do it when you are in the same situation
again

- When decision making situation are complex and ambiguous, learning form experience might be
more exceptional than most of us would be inclined to assume.
- When confronted with messy problems we often lack any experience to guide us in the decision
making process

Two important issues in structuring messy problems:
1. People in general employ ill-defined concepts, which frequently leads to miscommunication
2. People also frequently employ tacit (causal) assumptions about a problem, which do not hold
even when constructing a causal loop diagram

When starting to build a CLD the first problem is to define concepts and find concrete variables.

Summary on page 40

Chapter 2 – System dynamics: problem identification and system conceptualization
Open-loop approach to decision making implies that decisions are seen as unaffected by the
decisions themselves. In closed loop thinking decisions are seen as a means to affect the
environment, and changes in the environment in turn provide input to decisions which aim to
influence the environment.




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ImkeGommans. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.30. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.30  27x  sold
  • (8)
  Add to cart