100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Essay Plan: Evaluate the view that the Electoral College is not fit for purpose $7.07
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Government And Politics
  6.  
  7. USA

Other

Essay Plan: Evaluate the view that the Electoral College is not fit for purpose
 13 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • USA
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

An A* A Level Essay Plan for Politics A Level Paper 3 (USA) Contains 3 arguments and 3 corresponding counter-arguments, packed with recent examples

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

Document information

  • October 23, 2023
  • 1
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • electoral college
  • fit for purpose
  • politics
  • a level
  • edexcel
  • aqa
  • essay plan
  • usa

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Government and Politics
  • USA
All documents for this subject (27)

Seller

avatar-seller
oliverdawson

Content preview

Is the Electoral College fit for purpose?



Waster votes/misfire election

 Biden v Trump, Arizona, 49.3% to 49% - all 11 votes went to Biden
 Biden v Trump, California, 63% to 34% - extra votes wasted for Biden
 Misfire – Clinton won by 2.8 million votes lost by 77 votes



 Only 5 misfire elections since electoral college formation
 Legitimacy comes from fairly winning by the rules
 Issues with other methods – Congressional District Method (Maine + Nebraska) would
increase chances of no winner by majority of popular vote



EC violates ‘one person one vote’

 From Gray v Sanders 1963
 Every elector should represent 600,000
 But Wyoming shouldn’t even have 1 vote – overvalued
 California has 39 million, should have 65 votes gets 55 votes – undervalued



 Preserves voices of small states – tyranny of the majority
 Should be even more of a concern now
o 1788, small vs big stages X4 as many
o 2020, small vs big states X18 as many



Two horse race - third party candidates

 Clinton 43% v HW Bush 38% v Ross Perot 19%
32 seats v 18 seats v 0 seats
 Winner takes all divides, polarises, segregates country



 National unity – more likely for winner to take 50%

o In 27/40 elections, winner received more than 50%
 Perot attacked HW Bush on lacking economic know-how on recession and increasing
national debt

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller oliverdawson. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.07. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.07
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added