earn ng Goals
1 How stemperaturerelatedto aggress on
2 How s rac sm relatedto aggress on ngroupvs out group
3 Howdoespresence of weapons ncrease aggress on
4 Howdoes anonym ty effectaggress on
5 Howdoes ch ldhood maltreatment d sc pl n ng effectaggress on
6 Howdoesv olentmed a nfluence aggress on
EMPERATURE Heat v olence Anderason
heheathypothes s hot temperatures ncrease aggress ve mot vat on undercerta n cond t ons behav or
he neateffect observat on of h gher ratesof aggress on by people who are not relat vetopeoplewhoare
cold
esearchaboutheat aggress on can be stud ed n 3 forms
a f eldstud es
b labstud es w a focus on aggress on
c labstud es w a focus on aggress on relatedvar ables host lefeel ngs arousal bel efs
Id stud es
a stud es compar ng geograph creg ons
v olentcr merates are h gher n the south n Un tedStates s m lar nEurope aswell
Theeffectof southerness wasmeasured wh lecontroll ng fortemperature populat ons ze Ses ofthec t es
result pos t ve pathcoeff c ent forthel nkbetween temperature v olentcr me
b stud escompar ngt meper ods
Aggress ve hornhonk ng ncreasedathottertemperatures onlyforthecarsw thout a crond t on ng
F eldexper ment Dutchpol ces Burglaryscenar os mulat on nHot or comfortable cond t ons
Hotcond t on off cersweremoreaggress ve andthreat n ng
T mostf eld stud es are correlat onal
T two challenges to theneathypothes s changes nrout neact v t es southern culture
boratory stud es
The negat ve affect escape model
excess ve neat T aggress on whenthe total amount of negat ve affect a personexper ences s nthe low
thef ghtresponse
to moderaterange but that excess ve heat to aggress on when total negat ve
affectgetstooh gh thefl ghtresponse
when people'sattent on s notfocusedon temperature t ncreasesaggress on even e
factors are present
m
pggtngepggy.gg
Thethree of the
General
process cogn t veaffect
Be ng uncomfortable changes percept on crank ness not on arousal
m nor nsultsmaybeperce ved as major d
d rect nd rec
compat ble w thsoc alpsye cogn t veneo assoc at ontheory exc tat ontransfer theory
Behav oral scr ptmodel
i i
, ACISM n group outgroupread ng
d spos t onal
only react veAggress on gfactors
D splacedAggress on thetarget s nnocent wrongplaceatthewrongt me there
provoff nt sprovocat
nkh on
occurswhen a personcan'taggressor constra nedfrom aggress ng aga nstthesource of
D splaced aggress on maybed rectedaga nst nd v duals whothe aggressor perce vesd ss m larcoutgroupmembers
out groupstatus s assoc ated w negat v ty Therefore t m ght act vatenetworkof aggress onrelatedthoughts
emot ons behav ors n semant cmemory
stronger the d ss m lar ty h gherthelevel of d splaced aggress onmaybe
STUDY
Exam newhether Dutchmajor ty youths aremorel kely to exh b t d splaced aggress onaga nstArabethn c
m nor ty out grouppeers moroccanyouths
Part c pantswereDutchyouthsrandomlyass gned to rel eve e ther negat ve orneutral peer feedbackfrom
other samegender same ageDutchyouths
Theywereprov ded w the opportun ty to aggress aga nstfour un nvolved peers 2Dutch 2morrocon
Aggress on was measured w po ntsubtract on aggress onParad gm
Part c pants were told that they were gonna compete n an nternet game surv vor
they createdaccountsandJudgesgavefeedback onthe rprof le negat ve orneutral
Results
total aggress onh gher nthose who gotnegat vefeedback
Part c pantswho rec evednegat vepeerfeedback d splayedh gherlevels ofd splacedaggress onaga nstmorrocantargets
contrary to expectat on morenegat veatt tudestowardMoroccanpeers d dn'tpred ctmore aggress on towards
Moroccantargets fromthequest onna re
WEAPONS
canJustsee ng a gun ncrease aggress on
Berkow tz LePage
Pa rswereevaluat ng eachothersperformance on a task
The evaluat ons werethe of stressful electr cal shockg ven rangedfrom e ed
one of the part c pant was an accompl ce of theexper menter
he e ther evaluatedthe part c pantsperformance w 7 shocks provocat on cond t on
or w no shocks no provocat on cond t on
Then thepart c pant evaluated the accompl ce'sperformance of shocks werethemeasureforaggress on
The part c pant were e ther seated at atablethat had a shotgun revolver on t or badm ntonrackets
There werealso a control group w no tems on thetable
result provoked part c pants whosawthegunsweremoreaggress ve Weapons Effect
h s current metaanalys s testswhether weaponshave a greatereffect on provokedpart c pantsthan on
unprovokedpart c pants
effectsotweaponsonagggs gg ghts gnarf sthost leappra sals
AM General aggress on model
2 nputs personal s tuat onal
Th s metaanalys s focuses on 3 personal nputs gender age whetherwerecollegestudents or not
on 2 s tuat onal nputs exposure toweapon provocat on
Accord ng to 6am personal s tuat onal factors nfluence one's nternal state wh chcan ncludeaggress ve
cogn t on aggress veaffect phys olog calarousallevels
I
i i
i ii
i i
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller adaturkmen03. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.