Exam (elaborations)
politicaleconomysecondpaper
- Course
- Institution
an essay answering one of the midterm questions
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
laylaaboudan
Content preview
Prof. Brawley Poli 243McGill University Winter 2023
Suggested Paper Topics: Second Assignment
In this paper, you will be applying arguments to one of the cases we have covered. A list of
suggested topics is given below, but you may pursue a different topic if it is approved by Prof.
Brawley. (You must get an alternative topic confirmed by March 10th). Papers should be no
more than 1500 words, with bibliography included. There is no need for a title page. You are
expected to use 2 or 3 sources from class, as well as 1 to 3 sources from outside the course.
Reminder: The assignment is worth 25% of the course total, and is due March 17th at 5pm. All
submissions must be via MyCourses. Late papers will be penalized 3 points per day.
1. According to the Stolper-Samuelson approach, should Britain have repealed the Corn Laws
in 1846? Would Constructivism offer a more persuasive explanation?
2. At the end of the 1870s, Canada introduced the National Policy. Can we explain this policy
choice by using the Stolper-Samuelson theorem? What rival approach might offer a better
explanation?
3. In 1911, President Taft proposed a reciprocal trade agreement with Canada. Why did Taft do
this? Would you be satisfied with the argument (within Analytical Liberalism) based on the
sector-specific model of trade? What is added by introducing intra-industry firm
heterogeneity?
4. Canadians voted against the U.S. offer for reciprocal tariff reductions in 1911. How would
an Analytical Liberal argument based on intra-industry firm heterogeneity explain this
outcome? Would an argument from Structural Realism be better here?
5. Can Analytical Liberals explain Britain’s Repeal of the Corn Laws? Which specific
argument within Analytical Liberalism is most accurate? Would a Constructivist argument
be more persuasive?
6. How would Structural Realists explain Britain’s Return to the Gold Standard after World War
I? Would this be more persuasive than an Analytical Liberal’s explanation?
7. What distinguishes a Marxist argument for Britain’s Repeal of the Corn Laws from an
Analytical Liberal argument? Which do you find more persuasive? Why?
8. Britain’s return to the gold standard after Word War I at such a high exchange rate is
puzzling. How would an Analytical Liberal explain this specific outcome? How would a
Constructivist? Which argument is better?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laylaaboudan. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
57413 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now