100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting Criminalistiek en Bewijswaardering $6.89   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting Criminalistiek en Bewijswaardering

 66 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Alle literatuur, aantekeningen van de hoorcolleges en aantekeningen van de werkgroepen van het vak Criminalistiek en Bewijswaardering aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Preview 4 out of 42  pages

  • No
  • Hoofdstuk 1 t/m 9
  • October 26, 2023
  • 42
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
2023-2024 Kayleigh de Bruin




23053521 – Criminalistiek en Bewijswaardering

Samenvatting Literatuur en Hoorcolleges

Semester 1 2023-2024

,2023-2024 Kayleigh de Bruin

Literatuur week 1: 4 – 8 September

Boek Hoofdstuk 1: Introduction

Forensic evidence can help us to establish the following:

 That a particular person was at a given place at a given time;

 That a particular person carried out an activity, such as signing a cheque or breaking a

window;

 That something was done with a particular instrument, for example, a door was forced

with a particular tool;

 A relationship between two people, for example, a paternity disputes and incest or

immigration cases.

We propose to concentrate on how such evidence should be interpreted and incorporated

into the court process.

1.1 Three Principles.

() Locard’s principle: a perpetrator will either leave marks or traces on the crime scene or

carry traces from the crime scene. This is often misquoted as every contact leaves a trace.

() Principle of individuality: Two objects may be indistinguishable, but no two objects are

identical.

() Individualisation principle: if enough similarities are seen between two objects to

exclude the possibility of coincidence, then those objects must have come from the same

source.

The possibility of a coincidence can never be completely excluded. No general

criterion is possible for the number of coincidences needed to decide an individualisation.

How certain we could be would also depend on other evidence and information in the

case. Clearly, such issues and decisions are not up to the forensic scientist but rather the

,2023-2024 Kayleigh de Bruin

trier of fact. The role of the forensic scientist is not to decide the issue but to describe what

the evidence is worth. This principle should, therefore, not be used.

1.2 Dreyfus, Bertillon, and Poincare.

Anthropometry (or Bertillonage): required to take a series of photographs and

measurements of bone features, which were known not to change after adolescence. Later,

fingerprints were added to the features recorded (vingerafdrukken, geen vingersporen!). the

basis of the system was that it would be unlikely that any two people would have the same

measurements over the whole range of features. Pioncare made three important points about

Bertillon’s evidence.

1. Bertillon had erred in that the figure he produced was the probability of getting the

four similarities amongst four examined characteristics.

2. Events that have actually occurred might be seen beforehand as highly improbable.

3. Inverse probability problem: the difference between calculating in advance the

probability of an effect and calculating after the event the most probable cause of an

effect.

Pioncare went on to make the point that single items of evidence enable us to alter our

assessment of the probability of an event but they cannot determine the probability of an event

on their own.

To be able to calculate, form an observed event, the probability of a cause, we need

several data:

1. We need to know what was a priori, before the event, and the probability of this cause.

2. We then need to know, for each possible cause, the probability of the observed event.

1.3 Requirements for Forensic Scientific Evidence

A photograph is a questionable value, particularly if much time has passed since it was

taken. Similarly, physical descriptions can be broadcast on police radios; even the most

, 2023-2024 Kayleigh de Bruin

rudimentary description will eliminate a large proportion of the population. However, when

identity is seriously challenged, descriptions and eyewitness identification are of questionable

value, perhaps because the question has become whether the perpetrator was the accused or

someone of similar appearance.

Lawyers often tend to ignore evidence that does not claim to provide certainty, but by

doing so, they lose relevant and probative evidence.

Hoorcollege 1 (6 September)

Forensic science: the application of scientific principles and technological practices for

the purposes of justice in the study and resolution of criminal, civil and regulatory issues

(American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2003).

Forensic science: a systematic endeavor to describe how events of legal concern have

happened based on observation, hypothesis formation, and experiment (Sensabaugh, 1997).

Criminalistics: the science of individualisation (Kirk, 1963).

Criminalistiek: Terug redeneren (Berger, 2010).

Criminalistiek: that profession and scientific discipline directed to the recognition,

identification, individualisation, and evaluation of physical evidence by application of the

physical and natural sciences to law-sciences matters (American Board of Criminalistics).

Criminalistiek: that professional occupation concerned with the scientific analysis and

examination of physical evidence, its interpretation, and its presentation in court (California

Association of Criminalists).

Nederlands Forensisch Instituut (NFI).

Gesloten systemen: handheld devices / Open systemin: laptop en computers.

MFT: ondersteuning van de politie bij moordzaken, vooral in regio’s waar moordzaken

nauwelijks voorkomen.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kayleighdebruin1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60904 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.89
  • (0)
  Add to cart