Sophia Pathways English Composition II Touchstone 4 Study Guide Revisions

Effectiveness of Capital Punishment in Deterring Homicide Crimes Countries and states that practice capital punishment (death penalty) express the rationale it helps to deter homicide crimes (Ehrlich, 2017). Proponents of death capital argue that it helps in deterring homicide crimes because individuals having intensions of committing heinous crimes will fear being executed. However, this claim has encountered opposition, mainly because of the moral and religious issues surrounding the death penalty (Nagin, 2018). Nevertheless, the opponents of capital punishment claim that it is inhuman and that other options can be put in place to punish the homicide criminal and serve justice to the victims and their families. For example, the homicide criminal could serve life imprisonment, which is humane and less costly. Additionally, capital punishment is a government program that comes with cost implications. Although proponents of the death penalty claim that execution saves the government money, the modern death penalty has established to be quite expensive (Ehrlich, 2017). Notably, there exist a few research discoveries indicating that capital punishment has gotten expensive when contrasted with its expected advantages of daunting murder violations. The costs related to the death penalty are getting to an ever-increasing extent. Hence, the American death penalty framework is expensive to the citizens, which makes one ask whether capital punishment is worth it. It is along these lines noteworthy that the administration reexamines the financial significance of capital punishment in deflecting homicide crimes (Bohm, 2016). Capital punishment is ineffective in deterring of homicide crimes, and it is expensive when contrasted with life-detainment.