Exam (elaborations)
PHIL 235 QUIZ 4 practice questions and answers Concordia University 2024
- Course
- Institution
PHIL 235 QUIZ 4 practice questions and answers Concordia University 2024
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
smartzone
Reviews received
Content preview
PHIL 235 QUIZ 4 practice questions and answers Concordia UniversityQuestion 1: The Nuremberg Code (followed by the Declaration of Helsinki) resulted from
inquiries into what happened in Nazi Germany in terms of research with human subjects.
True
False
Question 2: According to Laura Purdy, the possibility that high-risk pregnancies can be
detected prior to conception is irrelevant since there is a fundamental right to have children
regardless of the risks.
True
False
Question 3: The case of Halushka v. University of Saskatchewan established in Canadian Law
that in cases of determining how much information needs to be provided in a non-therapeutic
setting, researchers must use the test of “what the reasonable person would want to know.”
True
False
Question 4: According to Leon Kass, the debate about genetic screening and pre-natal
diagnosis cannot be detached from the ongoing debate regarding abortion.
True
False
Question 5: For Baylis and Robert, despite the serious moral issues related to “genetic
enhancement,” this
direction is inevitable and we should work to ensure that we develop new genetic technologies
in the most ethical way possible.
True
False
In this unit, we read about two very famous cases of unethical medical experimentation, the
Tuskegee Study and the research conducted by Dr. Ewen Cameron. Choose ONE of these two
examples. Give a brief description of the case and indicate what ethical issues the case reveals.
The Tuskegee study was an experiment examining African American men who were diagnosed
with syphilis, the study ran the course of 40 years. For the most part, the men were poor and
uneducated, they became part of the trial for treatment of bad blood. It is assumed that the
men agreed to participate with the promise of free medical care and meals during the visits.
During the trial, the researchers discovered that penicillin cures syphilis, however they did not
tell the participants. They also neglected to tell them that syphilis is a spreadable disease.
The US Public Health Servants, who conducted the study, should have advised the men about
this new evidence, but they neglected to do so. Because of this trial, the FDA reassessed its
ethical code for conducting clinical trials. This trial helped reveal the need for Ethical Review
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smartzone. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
74735 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now