100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
JOMC 486 – Midterm Exam Verified 100% Correct!! $10.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

JOMC 486 – Midterm Exam Verified 100% Correct!!

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

JOMC 486 – Midterm Exam Verified 100% Correct!! Paul Robert Cohen In 1986 - Arrested for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the Draft" Violations of the first amendment -Obscenity -Hate Speech -Fighting Words -Incitement of unlawful activity Issue: no violence Cohen had the right to wear...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • November 28, 2023
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
JOMC 486 – Midterm Exam Verified 100% Correct!!
Paul Robert Cohen
In 1986 - Arrested for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the Draft"
Violations of the first amendment
-Obscenity
-Hate Speech
-Fighting Words
-Incitement of unlawful activity
Issue: no violence
Cohen had the right to wear the jacket bc communicating emotional feeling // violation to
his freedom of speech
Words of the First Amendment applying to media
Law, abridging, freedom, speech, and press
Government power to punish or restrict expression is limited to a few
Obscenity, libel, fighting words, threats, and fraud
Level of Scrutiny
Rational-basis
Strict Scrutiny
Intermediate scrutiny
Rational Basis
In U.S. constitutional law, the lowest level of scrutiny applied by courts deciding
constitutional issues through judicial review. Almost always found constitutional.

Ex: Airbags in cars
Strict Scrutiny
When a law imposes limitations on a fundamental right, such as freedom of speech or
freedom of religion. Almost always found unconstitutional.

Ex: National Security
Intermediate scrutiny
Used in cases involving expressive conduct

Ex: Marches not during rush hour
Levels of Speech
Pure, intermediate, unprotected
Pure Speech
given the highest level of protection; examples: public speech, writing a letter,
publishing a newspaper or book
Intermediate
examples: symbolic speech (conduct or action), advertising, broadcasting
Unprotected
examples: fighting words, libel, obscenity, threats, fraud
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Brandenburg Test

, state may punish speech that is seditious or may encourage criminal behavior if there is
evidence of:
-intent to incite violence
-imminence of violence
-likelihood of violence
U.S v O'Brien
To protest the Vietnam war David Paul O'Brien burned his draft card
On the back of the card it says any destruction is illegal
This is considered expressive speech, O'Brien was trying to communicate/send a
message
O'Brien Test
used for determining when the state interest in regulating conduct is sufficient to justify
some limitations on symbolic expression or actions that have some expressive purpose
-is the regulation within the constitutional power of government?
-does it further SUBSTANTIAL governmental interest?
-is the governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of expression?
-is any incidental restriction of First Amendment freedoms no greater than necessary for
furthering the governmental interest?
If yes to all four it will be constitutional
fighting words
which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the
peace; US Supreme Court declared regulation of fighting words must be content
neutral; fighting words are outside First Amendment
Characteristics of fighting words
personal insults likely to provoke violent response; spoken in a face-to-face situation;
concern is whether the recipient of the words will respond with violence against the
speaker
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
Characteristics of Seditious Speech
calls for political, social or economic change through violent, unlawful means; may be
spoken or written; concern is whether the recipients of the words will commit violent or
illegal acts against third parties
Prior Restraints
preventing publication; publication must inevitably, directly and immediately cause harm
to nation security in order to be constitutional
Elements of Libel
Defamation
Identification
Publication
Falsity
Injury
Fault
Defamation
tens to so harm the reputation of another so as: to lower him or her in the estimation of
the community, or deter third persons from associating or doing business with him
Defamation per se

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ACADEMICAIDSTORE. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart