Class notes
Class notes Transnational Governance
- Course
- Institution
Lecture notes on classes from the Master's Political Science mandatory course Transnational Politics
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
microwavedlettuce
Content preview
Transnational Politics Lecture NotesLecture 1 (07/09/2022): Power and legitimacy in global politics
Transnational: the career of a concept
- Transnational America: early 20th century; cosmopolitan and inclusive for immigrants
- After WWII: growing concern for minorities (as victims of state-centred approach)
- Political economy: transnational corporations
- End of Cold War -> growing attention for transnational in social sciences -> global
governance
- Core debate: state-centred vs (global) society dominated (and interest for minorities) -
> power
Transnational politics
- Transnational
o (Nye and Keohane reading)
- Transnational politics
o May be understood as politics that transcend the confines of the formal
political institutions that have crystallised in the (19th and) 20th century
Main questions by Nye and Keohane
- Loss of control national states?
- Is state-centric approach in political science still valid?
- What are the effects of transnational relations?
- Who benefits from transnational relations, who loses?
- Role of (non-gov) transnational organisation in global gov issues?
Network polity (Bevir)
- Power is diffuse
- Government (nation-state) is just one public body involved in policy making (others
are also relevant and we need to study them)
- Government rarely controls and dictates policy – it attempts to steer ang regulate
policy networks via laws, money, and negotiation
- But main question is: policy specialisation (new form of governance) or new theory of
governance?
Rethinking global governance
- Differentiated polity: governance occurs in and through transnational networks. But
how? And what happens if governance mechanisms fail?
- The policy, authority, and resources necessary for tackling global problems remain
vested in individual states rather the collectively in universal institutions, but the
problems not -> collective action problem and free-riders
Rival hypotheses
- 1a) engagement in transnational politics empowers marginalised groups
- 1b) engagement in transnational politics reinforces the power of predominant
(nationalistic) political actors in decision-making
- 2a) transnational politics decreases the control of nation-states over their populations
- 2b) transnational politics increases the control of nation-states over their populations
1
, - 3a) transnational political issues are best governed by state institutions: the nation
state is still the supreme source of authority from which other institutions derive their
power
- 3b) transnational political issues are best governed through transnational
arrangements
Legitimacy
- Empirical: when studying legitimacy you study the reasons why people actually put
up with systematic use of power
o Classical origin comes from Max Weber
o Legitimacy just is the belief in legitimacy; but this tells us nothing about
whether we have reason to believe in legitimacy or what reasons we have to
comply
Intrinsically and extrinsically evaluative concepts
- Intrinsically evaluative concepts cannot be used without expressing a value judgement
about its object
o If you can use it in a concept that does not imply any value judgement it is not
intrinsically evaluative
o E.g. justice
- Extrinsically evaluative concepts can be used in ways that are evaluative or not
o E.g. equality
- Legitimacy
o Normatively intrinsic, but empirical researchers may argue that it is extrinsic
(statement of expectations of things that may or may not happen)
o Divergence explains a lot about different subfields of political science
Hurrell and Macdonald
- About what should be the type of power that we look to regulate when we aim at
crafting some normative principles of legitimacy for the global order
- It is not empirically obvious anymore that the only important place that power is
exercised is the sovereign state
- Authors propose that before we launch into producing a new theory of political
legitimacy, we need to agree what has replaced the unified sovereign state as the
subject of the traditional theories of legitimacy
- Identify 3 families of answers to the question
o States (Westphalian)
▪ If we didn’t have massive problems with the Westphalian picture, we
wouldn’t be having this conversation in the first place
o Basic structure (Rawlsian)
▪ Global basic structure is/should be the subject of global principles of
legitimacy -> system of social cooperation (or at least we should strive
for this) and structure to solve conflicts that we may run into
▪ We know that such structures have expanded well beyond states and in
that case we need principles to regulate this
▪ Not clear that the kind of story that tells us when questions of
distributive justice arise can tell us anything about legitimacy
o Global governance
2
, ▪ Different kinds of power exercised all over the place, they all can be
made to contribute to a single vision of what should be the question of
global exercise of power
▪ Too optimistic -> presupposes cooperative attitudes, consensus on the
aims of the use of power that is not to be found in this pluralistic
myriad of institutions
- Authors propose new subject: global public power (defined in reading)
- Rossi’s take
o Empty box in sense that it leaves a lot to be filled in empirically
o Does not have much value until we fill in that box with empirics
o First two conditions are empty boxes, third condition tells us what we should
use to fill in those boxes
o Disagreements
▪ 1) they keep talking about the exercise of power, but it seems that
leaves something important out of the picture: you can have power
without exercising it. Trade-off in looking for the observable stuff
where you end up neglecting the less obvious power that is not
exercised
▪ 2) if you are looking for these general principles, you still haven’t
completely shed that statist heritage that we are looking to get rid of by
moving away from a state-centric views -> why are we looking for this
subject? Even posing the question of what a uniform framework should
be presupposes that model that power is only in one place and
hierarchically organised, which replicates the sovereigntist scheme
3
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller microwavedlettuce. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now